Abstract
An experiment was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of newer insecticides against sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra during 2013–2014 at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani. Mean population of aphids and jassids after three sprays revealed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha was effective and superior. The next best were thiamethoxam 25 WG 25 g a.i./ha 2.62 and 4.41 followed by acetamiprid 20 SP @ 20 g a.i./ha which were at par. The treatments profenofos 50 EC @ 500 g a.i./ha, fipronil 5 SC @ 50 g a.i./ha and buprofezin 25 SC @ 250 g a.i./ha were also found statistically at par. Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i./ha recorded 6.29 aphids/3 leaves as compared to 14.55 aphids/3 leaves in untreated control. Whiteflies were controlled significantly by acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) 20 g a.i./ha (1.96/3 leaves) followed by imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha (2.81/3 leaves).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 17.8 SL reduced the mean population of aphids and jassids on okra and was the most effective and superior treatment.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentuse0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./hae1
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Second interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- Mean population of aphids and jassidse1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e1“Mean population of aphids and jassids after three sprays revealed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha was effective and superior”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam 25 WG was the next best treatment for aphids and jassids on okra, with values of 2.62 and 4.41.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxam 25 WG 25 g a.i./hae2
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Second interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- Mean population of aphids and jassidse1
- Direction
- next beste2
- Value
- 2.62 and 4.41e2
- Comparator
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./hae1
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e1“Mean population of aphids and jassids after three sprays revealed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha was effective and superior”
e2“The next best were thiamethoxam 25 WG 25 g a.i./ha 2.62 and 4.41 followed by acetamiprid 20 SP @ 20 g a.i./ha which were at par”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenofos, fipronil and buprofezin were statistically at par with imidacloprid for aphids and jassids on okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- profenofos 50 EC @ 500 g a.i./ha, fipronil 5 SC @ 50 g a.i./ha and buprofezin 25 SC @ 250 g a.i./hae3
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Second interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- Mean population of aphids and jassidse1
- Direction
- at pare3
- Comparator
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./hae1
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e1“Mean population of aphids and jassids after three sprays revealed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha was effective and superior”
e3“The treatments profenofos 50 EC @ 500 g a.i./ha, fipronil 5 SC @ 50 g a.i./ha and buprofezin 25 SC @ 250 g a.i./ha were also found statistically at par”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad 45 SC reduced aphid counts on okra to 6.29 per 3 leaves, against 14.55 in the untreated control.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i./hae4
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae4peste0
- Outcome
- aphids/3 leavese4
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede4
- Value
- 6.29 aphids/3 leavese4
- Qualifier
- 14.55 aphids/3 leavese4
- Comparator
- untreated controle4
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e4“Spinosad 45 SC @ 75 g a.i./ha recorded 6.29 aphids/3 leaves as compared to 14.55 aphids/3 leaves in untreated control”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) significantly controlled whiteflies on okra, with 1.96 per 3 leaves.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) 20 g a.i./hae5
- Interactor
- WhitefliesAleyrodoideae5peste0
- Outcome
- Whitefliese5
- Direction
- controlled significantlye5
- Value
- 1.96/3 leavese5
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e5“Whiteflies were controlled significantly by acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) 20 g a.i./ha (1.96/3 leaves) followed by imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha (2.81/3 leaves)”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid 17.8 SL ranked second for whitefly control on okra, with 2.81 per 3 leaves, behind acetamiprid.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./hae5
- Interactor
- WhitefliesAleyrodoideae5peste0
- Outcome
- Whitefliese5
- Direction
- followed bye5
- Value
- 2.81/3 leavese5
- Comparator
- acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) 20 g a.i./hae5
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e5“Whiteflies were controlled significantly by acetamiprid 20 SP (rt) 20 g a.i./ha (1.96/3 leaves) followed by imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha (2.81/3 leaves)”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
Claim · model-written summary
Acetamiprid 20 SP was statistically at par with imidacloprid for aphids and jassids on okra.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- acetamiprid 20 SP @ 20 g a.i./hae2
- Interactor
- aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
- Second interactor
- jassidse0pest
- Outcome
- Mean population of aphids and jassidse1
- Direction
- at pare2
- Comparator
- imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./hae1
- Setting
- research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhanie6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“sucking pests viz., aphids, jassids and whitefly on okra”
e1“Mean population of aphids and jassids after three sprays revealed that imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 20 g a.i./ha was effective and superior”
e2“The next best were thiamethoxam 25 WG 25 g a.i./ha 2.62 and 4.41 followed by acetamiprid 20 SP @ 20 g a.i./ha which were at par”
e6“at the research farm, College of Agriculture, Parbhani”
The same questions in other papers
spinosad · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
acetamiprid · Aleyrodoidea · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · Aleyrodoidea · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
imidacloprid · Aphidomorpha · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.