Paper · 2023 · Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Biofertilizer and lighting as factors affecting tomato growth, development and biochemical composition

I. V. Knyazeva; O. V. Vershinina; A. V. Titenkov; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A comprehensive study of growth and biochemical composition of the Blagodatny variety tomato plants grown with the use of bacterial spores Bacillus cereus strain 96 under continuous LED lighting based on full spectrum photons in the proportion B: G: R: FR ~ 17: 23: 43: 17 was conducted. Plants grown with high-pressure sodium lamps (HPS) without bacterial culture action were used as controls. A number of parameters reflecting plant growth and quality of tomato fruits were studied - the content of photosynthetic pigments, dry matter and organic acids. It was shown that during the growing season, tomato plants grown under LED illumination had a longer shoot length compared to the plants in the sodium variant. The action of the bacteria manifested itself during fruit ripening with significant differences under both sodium and LED lighting. The effect of dry matter under the influence of bacteria on the plants grown with sodium lighting did not differ from the control variant. The observed differences became more pronounced and reliably significant in the plants under LED lighting. Application of B. cereus bacterial culture increased the concentration of chlorophylls a, b and carotenoids compared to the control. When evaluating the effect of different types of lighting and the use of B. cereus bacteria on the accumulation of organic acids in fruits, it was found that LED lighting had a better effect on the synthesis of organic acids. Tomato plants treated with B. cereus were distinguished by the formation of fruits with a high content of succinic, malic and citric acids with a sodium type of lighting. When analyzing the fruits of tomato plants grown under LED lighting, a change in the accumulation of only succinic acid was noted. The use of different lighting sources and biofertilizers caused changes in the development of tomato plants under climate chamber conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED lighting lengthened shoots relative to sodium lamps.

Treatment
LED illuminatione0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
sodium variante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“tomato plants grown under LED illumination had a longer shoot length compared to the plants in the sodium variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial effects during fruit ripening were significant under both lights.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The action of the bacteria manifested itself during fruit ripening with significant differences under both sodium and LED lighting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacteria did not change dry matter under sodium lighting.

Treatment
bacteriae0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
control variante0
Setting
sodium lightinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of dry matter under the influence of bacteria on the plants grown with sodium lighting did not differ from the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–985 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial effects under LED light were more pronounced and significant.

Outcome
observed differencese0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Setting
LED lightinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The observed differences became more pronounced and reliably significant in the plants under LED lighting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cereus increased chlorophylls a and b and carotenoids.

Treatment
B. cereus bacterial culturee0
Interactor
B. cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
concentration of chlorophylls a, b and carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of B. cereus bacterial culture increased the concentration of chlorophylls a, b and carotenoids compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED lighting favored organic acid synthesis.

Treatment
LED lightinge0
Outcome
synthesis of organic acidse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“LED lighting had a better effect on the synthesis of organic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1451 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cereus with sodium light produced fruit high in succinic, malic and citric acids.

Treatment
B. cereuse0
Interactor
B. cereusBacillus cereuse0symbiont
Outcome
high content of succinic, malic and citric acidse0
Direction
highe0
Setting
sodium type of lightinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Tomato plants treated with B. cereus were distinguished by the formation of fruits with a high content of succinic, malic and citric acids with a sodium type of lighting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under LED lighting, only succinic acid accumulation changed.

Treatment
LED lightinge0
Outcome
accumulation of only succinic acide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruits of tomato plants grown under LED lighting, a change in the accumulation of only succinic acid was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1753 · show in text ↑

Bacillus cereus · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus cereus · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 42 positive, 29 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

light · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 155 positive, 71 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

441 papers: 387 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 387 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.