Paper · 2023 · Pollution Research

BIO-EFFICACY OF PINOXADEN AS POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE AGAINST WEEDS IN WHEAT CROP

RAGHAV PATEL; A.K JHA; BADAL VERMA; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

A field study was carried out during the rabi season 2020-21 to identify weed species and investigate the efficacy of post-emergence herbicides on weeds and their effect on wheat grain yield at AICRP on Wheat, JNKVV, Jabalpur (M.P.). Seven different treatments were applied, namely pinoxaden at 40 g a.i./ha, pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha, pinoxaden at 90 g a.i./ha, clodinafop propargyl at 90 g a.i./ha, sulfosulfuron at 25 g a.i./ha as post-emergence (25 DAS), hand weeding at 30 DAS and weedy check. The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%). All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and improved the grain yield compared with the weedy check. The highest mortality of weeds (41.12%) was recorded where pinoxaden at 90 g a.i./ha was applied. However, pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha is the most effective and best option for higher values of growth parameters, yield attributes and maximum wheat grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medicago denticulata comprised 30.82% of recorded weeds.

Interactor
Medicago denticulatae0weed
Outcome
number of individualse0
Value
30.82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds in wheat crop”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 62–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cichorium intybus comprised 29.94% of recorded weeds.

Interactor
Cichorium intybusCichorium intybuse0weed
Outcome
number of individualse0
Value
29.94%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cichorium intybus
Cichorium intybus · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“WEEDS IN WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor comprised 15.60% of recorded weeds.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
number of individualse0
Value
15.60%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium album comprised 15.32% of recorded weeds.

Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
number of individualse0
Value
15.32%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anagallis arvensis comprised 8.30% of recorded weeds.

Interactor
Anagallis arvensisLysimachia arvensise0weed
Outcome
number of individualse0
Value
8.30%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysimachia arvensis
Lysimachia arvensis · InteractorAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of individuals was recorded for Medicago denticulata (30.82%), Cichorium intybus (29.94%), Phalaris minor (15.60%), Chenopodium album (15.32%) and Anagallis arvensis (8.30%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT CROP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides significantly reduced target weed density compared with weedy check.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density of target weed florae0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and improved the grain yield compared with the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides improved wheat grain yield compared with weedy check.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicide treatments provided significant control of weeds causing significant reduction in density of target weed flora and improved the grain yield compared with the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–190 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 90 g a.i./ha produced the highest weed mortality, 41.12%.

Treatment
pinoxaden at 90 g a.i./hae0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
mortality of weedse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest mortality of weeds (41.12%) was recorded where pinoxaden at 90 g a.i./ha was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect on wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–190 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha was judged best for growth parameters and yield attributes.

Treatment
pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha is the most effective and best option for higher values of growth parameters, yield attributes and maximum wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1140 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha gave maximum wheat grain yield.

Treatment
pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha is the most effective and best option for higher values of growth parameters, yield attributes and maximum wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1140 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha was recommended as the best option.

Treatment
pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./hae0
Outcome
best optione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pinoxaden at 45 g a.i./ha is the most effective and best option for higher values of growth parameters, yield attributes and maximum wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1140 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.