Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Pinoxaden: An alternate herbicide against littleseed canary grass (Phalaris minor) in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Dharam Bir Yadav; S. S. Punia; Ashok Yadav; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at Karnal, Haryana during rabi 2005–06 and 2006–07 to evaluate the efficacy of pinoxaden against Phalaris minor in wheat. Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha and pinoxaden 5 EC (with built-in adjuvant) 50 g/ha reduced the dry weight of Phalaris minor to the extent of 92–99 and 89–98%, respectively, and were at par with weed free checks during both the years. Consequently, Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha and Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha being at par with weed free checks produced grain yield of wheat to the tunne of 6.1–6.2 and 5.7–6.1 t/ha. Efficacy of pinoxaden 10 EC against P. minor increased by about 70% with addition of adjuvant indicating that adjuvant is must with this formulation. Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha was superior to lower doses, fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron, however, it was at par with clodinafop during both the years. Both formulations of pinoxaden were ineffective against broad-leaved weeds. Maximum net returns (Rs 14,400-19,500/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (0.74–0.91) was obtained under pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha. There was no phytotoxicity on wheat and no residual toxicity on the succeeding rice crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 10 EC with adjuvant reduced Phalaris minor dry weight by 92–99%.

Treatment
Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/hae0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry weight of Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
92–99e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha and pinoxaden 5 EC (with built-in adjuvant) 50 g/ha reduced the dry weight of Phalaris minor to the extent of 92–99 and 89–98%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC reduced Phalaris minor dry weight by 89–98%.

Treatment
pinoxaden 5 EC (with built-in adjuvant) 50 g/hae0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry weight of Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
89–98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha and pinoxaden 5 EC (with built-in adjuvant) 50 g/ha reduced the dry weight of Phalaris minor to the extent of 92–99 and 89–98%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–346 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC yielded 6.1–6.2 t/ha wheat grain.

Treatment
Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
at pare0
Value
6.1–6.2e0
Comparator
weed free checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha and Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha being at par with weed free checks produced grain yield of wheat to the tunne of 6.1–6.2 and 5.7–6.1 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 10 EC with adjuvant yielded 5.7–6.1 t/ha wheat grain.

Treatment
Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/hae0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
at pare0
Value
5.7–6.1 t/hae0
Comparator
weed free checkse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha and Pinoxaden 10 EC 40 g/ha + adjuvant 2,000 ml/ha being at par with weed free checks produced grain yield of wheat to the tunne of 6.1–6.2 and 5.7–6.1 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adjuvant raised pinoxaden 10 EC efficacy against P. minor by about 70%.

Treatment
addition of adjuvante0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Efficacy of pinoxaden 10 EC against P. minore0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacy of pinoxaden 10 EC against P. minor increased by about 70% with addition of adjuvant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha was superior to lower doses, fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron.

Treatment
Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/hae0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
lower doses, fenoxaprop and sulfosulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha was superior to lower doses, fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha was at par with clodinafop.

Treatment
Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/hae1
Outcome
at pare0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
clodinafope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was at par with clodinafop during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–896 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha was superior to lower doses, fenoxaprop and sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both pinoxaden formulations were ineffective against broad-leaved weeds.

Treatment
Both formulations of pinoxadene0
Interactor
broad-leaved weedse0weed
Outcome
ineffective against broad-leaved weedse0
Direction
ineffectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both formulations of pinoxaden were ineffective against broad-leaved weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha gave maximum net returns of Rs 14,400-19,500/ha.

Treatment
pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/hae0
Outcome
Maximum net returnse0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
Rs 14,400-19,500/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum net returns (Rs 14,400-19,500/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (0.74–0.91) was obtained under pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha gave a benefit:cost ratio of 0.74–0.91.

Treatment
pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/hae0
Outcome
benefit: cost ratioe0
Value
0.74–0.91e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefit: cost ratio (0.74–0.91) was obtained under pinoxaden 5 EC 50 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No phytotoxicity occurred on wheat.

Outcome
no phytotoxicity on wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no phytotoxicity on wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1130 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No residual toxicity occurred on the succeeding rice crop.

Outcome
no residual toxicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no residual toxicity on the succeeding rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1183 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

adjuvant · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

pinoxaden · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

pinoxaden · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

adjuvant · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.