Paper · 2022 · Scientific Reports

The impact of nanofertilizer on agro-morphological criteria, yield, and genomic stability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Dina M. Salama; M. E. Abd El-Aziz; Essam A. Shaaban; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
62
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The use of agricultural fertilizers is one of the methods to beat the desired enormous increase in universal food production. The application of nanotechnology in agriculture is regarded as one of the promising approaches to elevate crop production. Whereas mineral nutrients play a crucial role in the growth and yield of the common bean. The experiments were conducted to investigate the application effect of micronutrients as nanoparticles (MN-NPs) on the common ben plants. The trial was performed in the field in El-Menofya, Egypt, through two seasons (2019 & 2020) in a randomized complete block design with three replicates and four combinations of MN-NPs (ZnO, MnO 2 and MoO 3 ) with concentrations 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 mg/L as a foliar application. The data exhibited that the foliar application of MN-NPs significantly upgraded the vegetative growth characters, flower number/plant, photosynthetic pigments, and yield. The concentration of 40 mg/L of MN-NPs leads to improving the vegetative growth, flowering number, and yield characteristics of the common bean. While the biochemical components varied in their response to MN-NPs combinations. The recommended MN-NPs concentration to ameliorate the common bean growth and yield was 40 mg/L.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MN-NPs significantly improved vegetative growth characters.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar application of MN-NPse0
Outcome
vegetative growth characterse0
Direction
upgradede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of MN-NPs significantly upgraded the vegetative growth characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MN-NPs significantly improved flower number per plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar application of MN-NPse0
Outcome
flower number/plante0
Direction
upgradede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of MN-NPs significantly upgraded the vegetative growth characters, flower number/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MN-NPs significantly improved photosynthetic pigments.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar application of MN-NPse0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
upgradede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of MN-NPs significantly upgraded the vegetative growth characters, flower number/plant, photosynthetic pigments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar MN-NPs significantly improved yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
foliar application of MN-NPse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
upgradede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of MN-NPs significantly upgraded the vegetative growth characters, flower number/plant, photosynthetic pigments, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–934 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 40 mg/L, MN-NPs improved vegetative growth, flowering number and yield characteristics.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment
40 mg/L of MN-NPse0
Outcome
vegetative growth, flowering number, and yield characteristicse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of 40 mg/L of MN-NPs leads to improving the vegetative growth, flowering number, and yield characteristics of the common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1079 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochemical components varied in response to MN-NP combinations.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
MN-NPs combinationse0
Outcome
biochemical componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the biochemical components varied in their response to MN-NPs combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1161 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended 40 mg/L MN-NPs for common bean growth and yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Outcome
40 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The recommended MN-NPs concentration to ameliorate the common bean growth and yield was 40 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1258 · show in text ↑

application · phenology · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 44 positive, 1 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

application · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 63 positive, 13 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

application · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 110 positive, 15 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

nanoparticle · phenology · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.