Abstract
High solar radiation, combined with high temperature, causes losses in plant production. The application of foliar protector in plants is associated with improvements in photosynthesis, reduction in leaf temperature and, consequently, improved productivity. Two experiments were conducted. The first aimed to assess the efficacy of foliar protector versus artificial shading in mitigating the negative impacts of excessive radiation and temperature on the physiology, growth, and yield of common bean plants. The second experiment focused on comparing the timing in cycle plants (phenological phases) of foliar protector application in two different bean cultivars (BRS Fc 104 and BRS MG Realce) under field conditions. Artificial shading provided better results for photosynthesis, transpiration, growth and production compared to the application of foliar protector. In the field conditions experiment, the application timing of the foliar protector at different phenological phases did not increase productivity in the cultivars. The application of foliar protector under the conditions studied was not effective in mitigating the negative impacts of high solar radiation and temperature on common bean cultivation. However, it is opportune to evaluate the application of foliar protector in bean plants grown under conditions with water deficit, high solar radiation and high temperature.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Artificial shading improved photosynthesis and transpiration relative to foliar protector.
- Treatment
- Artificial shadinge0
- Outcome
- photosynthesis, transpiratione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- application of foliar protectore0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Artificial shading provided better results for photosynthesis, transpiration, growth and production compared to the application of foliar protector.”
Claim · model-written summary
Artificial shading improved growth and production relative to foliar protector.
- Taxon
- Common Bean
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Artificial shadinge0
- Outcome
- growth and productione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- application of foliar protectore0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Artificial shading provided better results for photosynthesis, transpiration, growth and production compared to the application of foliar protector.”
t0“Common Bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Application timing of foliar protector at different phenological phases did not increase productivity in either cultivar.
- Taxon
- Common BeanPhaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- application timing of the foliar protector at different phenological phasese0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
- Setting
- field conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the field conditions experiment, the application timing of the foliar protector at different phenological phases did not increase productivity in the cultivars.”
t0“Common Bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar protector was ineffective against high radiation and temperature impacts under the studied conditions.
- Taxon
- common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
- Treatment
- application of foliar protectore0
- Outcome
- negative impacts of high solar radiation and temperaturee0
- Direction
- not effectivee0
- Qualifier
- under the conditions studiede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of foliar protector under the conditions studied was not effective in mitigating the negative impacts of high solar radiation and temperature on common bean cultivation.”
The same questions in other papers
application · soil: physics · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →shade · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →application · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 110 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.