Abstract
The influence of the soil subtype on the yield of the apple tree was studied in the conditions of the north of the Tambov region. Changing the soil subtype during the growing of an apple tree under these conditions can lead to an increase or decrease in apple yield and the fruit production profitability level by half. The transition from semi-dwarf to medium-sized apple rootstocks leads to an increase in direct costs and a decrease in the profitability level by half, subject to the successful combination of soil subtype with rootstock. The growing of apple trees on a rootstock 62-396 in the northern part of the Tambov region is most profitable, subject to their allocation on leached black earth soil and meadow black earth soil (profitability - 84.7...145.3%). The cultivation of apple trees on a rootstock 54-118 in the north of the Tambov region is most profitable, subject to their allocation on podzolized black earth soil and gray forest soil (profitability - 59.8...142.7%). The production of apple fruits on medium-sized rootstocks 54-118 is less profitable or unprofitable, subject to the allocation of apple trees on waterlogged meadow black earth soils. Keywords: APPLE TREES, VARIETY, SOIL, ROOTSTOCK, EFFICIENCY, YIELD
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Changing soil subtype could raise or lower apple yield.
- Taxon
- apple tree
Malus domesticae0 - Outcome
- apple yielde0
- Direction
- increase or decreasee0
- Setting
- soil subtypee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Changing the soil subtype during the growing of an apple tree under these conditions can lead to an increase or decrease in apple yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Changing soil subtype could raise or lower fruit production profitability by half.
- Taxon
- apple treeMalus domesticat0
- Outcome
- fruit production profitability levele0
- Direction
- increase or decreasee0
- Value
- halfe0
- Setting
- soil subtypet0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“an increase or decrease in apple yield and the fruit production profitability level by half”
t0“soil subtype and force for rootstock growth for economic efficiency of apple tree”
Claim · model-written summary
Changing from semi-dwarf to medium-sized rootstocks increased direct costs.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- medium-sized apple rootstockse0
- Outcome
- direct costse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- semi-dwarfe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transition from semi-dwarf to medium-sized apple rootstocks leads to an increase in direct costs”
Claim · model-written summary
Changing from semi-dwarf to medium-sized rootstocks decreased profitability by half.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- medium-sized apple rootstockse0
- Outcome
- profitability levele0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- halfe0
- Comparator
- semi-dwarfe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The transition from semi-dwarf to medium-sized apple rootstocks leads to an increase in direct costs and a decrease in the profitability level by half”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 62-396 was most profitable on leached and meadow black earth soils at 84.7...145.3%.
- Taxon
- apple treesMalus domesticae0
- Material
- rootstock 62-396e0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- most profitablee0
- Value
- 84.7...145.3%e0
- Setting
- Tambov regione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple trees on a rootstock 62-396 in the northern part of the Tambov region is most profitable, subject to their allocation on leached black earth soil and meadow black earth soil (profitability - 84.7...145.3%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 54-118 was most profitable on podzolized black earth and gray forest soils at 59.8...142.7%.
- Taxon
- apple treesMalus domesticae0
- Material
- rootstock 54-118e0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Direction
- most profitablee0
- Value
- 59.8...142.7%e0
- Setting
- Tambov regione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple trees on a rootstock 54-118 in the north of the Tambov region is most profitable, subject to their allocation on podzolized black earth soil and gray forest soil (profitability - 59.8...142.7%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Medium-sized rootstock 54-118 was less profitable or unprofitable on waterlogged meadow black earth soils.
- Taxon
- apple treesMalus domesticae0
- Material
- rootstocks 54-118e0
- Outcome
- profitablee0
- Direction
- less profitable or unprofitablee0
- Setting
- waterlogged meadow black earth soilse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“apple fruits on medium-sized rootstocks 54-118 is less profitable or unprofitable, subject to the allocation of apple trees on waterlogged meadow black earth soils”
The same questions in other papers
in vitro · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →grafting · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.