Abstract
The present experiment was carried out to compare the efficacy against Leucinodes Orbonalis and its effect on the yield of Brinjal. The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1). The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control. Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87). The yields among the treatment were significant. The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- Brinjal
Solanum melongenat0 - Treatment
- Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 ECe0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:10.2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SGe0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:9.8e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan 25 EC had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Carbosulfan 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:7.3e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:6.4e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad @ 45 % SC had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Spinosad @ 45 % SCe0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:5.5e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensise0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:5.2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil had the reported economic return relative to control.
- Taxon
- BrinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Neem oile0
- Outcome
- economical treatmente0
- Value
- 1:4.3e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best and most economical treatment was Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (1:10.2) which was on par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (1:9.8) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (1:7.3), Beauveria bassiana (1:6.4) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (1:5.5), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (1:5.2) and, Neem oil (1:4.3) as compared to control (1:3.1).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical treatments reduced shoot and fruit borer infestation compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- chemical treatmentse0
- Outcome
- significantly superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 ECe0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 5.94e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SGe0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 8.49e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan 25 EC produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Carbosulfan 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 10.71e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 12.91e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad @ 45 % SC produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Spinosad @ 45 % SCe0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 13.13e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacillus thuringiensis produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Bacillus thuringiensise0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 14.85e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil produced the reported shoot and fruit borer infestation.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Neem oile0
- Outcome
- percent infestatione1
- Value
- 16.87e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantriniliprole @ 18.5 EC (5.94) was par with Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (8.49) followed by Carbosulfan 25 EC (10.71), Beauveria bassiana (12.91) Spinosad @ 45 % SC (13.13), followed by Bacillus thuringiensis (14.85) and, Neem oil (16.87).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
e1“The data on the percent infestation of the shoot and fruit borer on brinjal 3rd, 7th, and 14th day after the first spray reveal that all the chemical treatments were significantly superior over control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC yielded 207.50 q/ha compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 207.50 q/hae0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG yielded 183.83 q/ha compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SGe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 183.83 q/hae0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan 25 EC yielded 137.9 q/ha compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Carbosulfan 25 ECe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 137.9 q/hae0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Beauveria bassiana yielded 124.6 q/ha compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Beauveria bassianae0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 124.6 q/hae0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad @ 45 % SC yielded 106.5 q/ha compared with control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Spinosad @ 45 % SCe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 106.5 q/hae0
- Comparator
- control plote0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole @ 18.5 SC (207.50 q/ha), Emamectin benzoate @ 5 SG (183.83 q/ha), Carbosulfan 25 EC (137.9 q/ha), Beauveria bassiana (124.6 q/ha), Spinosad @ 45 % SC (106.5 q/ha), Bacillus thuringiensis (98.3 q/ha) and Neem oil (87 q/ha), as compared to control plot (56.6 q/ha).”
t0“brinjal Solanum melongena (L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Beauveria bassiana · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
carbosulfan · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
17 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →emamectin benzoate · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
20 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →spinosad · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
25 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.