Abstract
Field studies were undertaken during winter 2012-13 at Bhubaneswar (Odisha) to reveal the impact of indigenous products and bio-nutrients along with reduced levels of fertilizers on the incidence of insect pests of brinjal cv.BLUE STAR.The fruit damage on number (36.4 to 37.2%) and weight (39.6 to 40.2%) basis varied non-significantly with respect to the nutrient level tested.Six sprays of spinosad 45 SC effectively restricted the fruit damage within 28.0 per cent as against 36.8-42.1 per cent in untreated control and this was followed by carbosulfan 2119 5 EC (32.2 -34.9%).The benefit cost ratio was appreciable when the crop was raised with 50%RDF + Bio-NPK and protected with carbosulfan 25EC(3.44:1)and spinosad 45SC (2.20:1).None of the indigenous products proved effective against shoot and fruit borer incidence.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit damage by number in brinjal varied non-significantly (36.4 to 37.2%) with the nutrient level tested.
- Taxon
- brinjal
Solanum melongenat0 - Treatment
- nutrient level testede1
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borert0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damagee1
- Direction
- varied non-significantlye1
- Value
- 36.4 to 37.2%e1
- Qualifier
- numbere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fruit damage on number (36.4 to 37.2%) and weight (39.6 to 40.2%) basis varied non-significantly with respect to the nutrient level tested”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit damage by weight in brinjal varied non-significantly (39.6 to 40.2%) with the nutrient level tested.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- nutrient level testede1
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borert0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damagee1
- Direction
- varied non-significantlye1
- Value
- 39.6 to 40.2%e1
- Qualifier
- weighte1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The fruit damage on number (36.4 to 37.2%) and weight (39.6 to 40.2%) basis varied non-significantly with respect to the nutrient level tested”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
Six sprays of spinosad 45 SC restricted fruit damage to within 28.0 per cent versus 36.8-42.1 per cent in the untreated control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- Six sprays of spinosad 45 SCe2
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borert0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damagee2
- Direction
- restrictede2
- Value
- 28.0 per cente2
- Qualifier
- 36.8-42.1 per cente2
- Comparator
- untreated controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“Six sprays of spinosad 45 SC effectively restricted the fruit damage within 28.0 per cent as against 36.8-42.1 per cent in untreated control”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
Carbosulfan 2119 5 EC gave fruit damage of 32.2-34.9%, the next best after spinosad and lower than the untreated control.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- carbosulfan 2119 5 ECe3
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borert0pest
- Outcome
- fruit damagee3
- Direction
- lowerinferrede3
- Value
- 32.2 -34.9%e3
- Comparator
- untreated controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“the fruit damage within 28.0 per cent as against 36.8-42.1 per cent in untreated control and this was followed by carbosulfan 2119 5 EC (32.2 -34.9%)”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit cost ratio was appreciable (3.44:1) with 50%RDF + Bio-NPK protected with carbosulfan 25EC.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- carbosulfan 25ECe4
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe4
- Direction
- appreciablee4
- Value
- 3.44:1e4
- Qualifier
- 50%RDF + Bio-NPKe4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“The benefit cost ratio was appreciable when the crop was raised with 50%RDF + Bio-NPK and protected with carbosulfan 25EC(3.44:1)”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit cost ratio was appreciable (2.20:1) with 50%RDF + Bio-NPK protected with spinosad 45SC.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- spinosad 45SCe5
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe5
- Direction
- appreciablee5
- Value
- 2.20:1e5
- Qualifier
- 50%RDF + Bio-NPKe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“The benefit cost ratio was appreciable when the crop was raised with 50%RDF + Bio-NPK and protected with carbosulfan 25EC(3.44:1)and spinosad 45SC (2.20:1)”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
Claim · model-written summary
None of the indigenous products was effective against shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal.
- Taxon
- brinjalSolanum melongenat0
- Treatment
- indigenous productse6
- Interactor
- shoot and fruit borere6pest
- Outcome
- shoot and fruit borer incidencee6
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“None of the indigenous products proved effective against shoot and fruit borer incidence”
t0“shoot and fruit borer incidence on brinjal”
The same questions in other papers
carbosulfan · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
carbosulfan · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →spinosad · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →spinosad · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree
25 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →application · pest · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.