Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]

Chirag Panwar; Usha Yadav; Ankush Meena; et al.

16
claims
45
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out in a Randomized Block Design having 3 replications and 8 treatments (seven insecticides and one control) during kharif season 2023 conducted at the Central Research Farm, NAINI, SHUATS, Prayagraj (U.P). The order of effectiveness was observed in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (11.79), (8.01) > Spinosad 45 SC (13.52), (10.52) > Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (14.91), (11.41) > Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (16.00), (12.39) > Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (16.71), (13.46) > Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (17.84), (14.79) > Neem oil 2% (20.03), (17.77) > untreated control plot (27.22), (32.12) based on percentage shoot and fruit infestation. While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96). Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC gave the highest yield (220.95 q/ha) among the treatments, followed by Spinosad 45 SC.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 ECe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
220.95 q/hae1
Comparator
Spinosad 45 SCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC gave the highest benefit cost ratio (1:6.48) among the treatments.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 ECe1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1:6.48e1
Comparator
Spinosad 45 SCe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC gave a yield of 198.20 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SCe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
198.20 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad 45 SC had a benefit cost ratio of 1:5.68, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Spinosad 45 SCe1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:5.68e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG gave a yield of 170.87 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
170.87 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.98, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:4.98e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana 1% WP gave a yield of 160.00 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Beauveria bassiana 1% WPe1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
160.00 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana 1% WP had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.75, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Beauveria bassiana 1% WPe1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:4.75e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm gave a yield of 140.69 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
140.69 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm had a benefit cost ratio of 1:4.13, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gme1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:4.13e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% gave a yield of 125.50 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1%e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
125.50 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% had a benefit cost ratio of 1:3.68, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1%e1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:3.68e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 2% gave a yield of 99.85 q/ha, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Neem oil 2%e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
99.85 q/hae1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil 2% had a benefit cost ratio of 1:2.96, higher than the untreated control.

Treatment
Neem oil 2%e1
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
1:2.96e1
Comparator
untreated control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“While highest yield and benefit cost ratio was obtained in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (220.95 q/ha), (1:6.48) followed by Spinosad 45 SC (198.20 q/ha), (1:5.68), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (170.87 q/ha), (1:4.98), Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (160.00 q/ha), (1:4.75), Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (140.69 q/ha), (1:4.13), Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (125.50 q/ha), (1:3.68), Neem oil 2% (99.85 q/ha), (1:2.96)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–1101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control plot gave the lowest monetary return (55.16 q/ha yield, benefit cost ratio 1:1.70).

Outcome
monetary returnse2
Direction
Leste2
Value
55.16 q/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Lest monetary returns was obtained with untreated control plot (55.16 q/ha), (1:1.70)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot and fruit infestation was ranked by treatment, with Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC the most effective and the untreated control plot the least effective.

Treatment
seven insecticidese0
Interactor
Leucinodes orbonalisLeucinodes orbonalist0pest
Outcome
shoot and fruit infestatione3
Direction
order of effectivenesse3
Comparator
untreated control plote3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leucinodes orbonalis
Leucinodes orbonalis · InteractorDonald Hobern · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8 treatments (seven insecticides and one control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“The order of effectiveness was observed in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 EC (11.79), (8.01) > Spinosad 45 SC (13.52), (10.52) > Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (14.91), (11.41) > Beauveria bassiana 1% WP (16.00), (12.39) > Metarhizium anisopliae 1x108 CFU/gm (16.71), (13.46) > Neem oil 0.4% + Pongamia oil 0.1% (17.84), (14.79) > Neem oil 2% (20.03), (17.77) > untreated control plot (27.22), (32.12) based on percentage shoot and fruit infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bio Efficacy and Economics of Selected Biopesticides against Shoot and Fruit Borer [Leucinodes orbonalis (G.)] on Brinjal [Solanum melongena (L.)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–146 · show in text ↑

Metarhizium anisopliae · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

emamectin benzoate · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

spinosad · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

botanical · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

transgenic · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

insecticide · Leucinodes orbonalis · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.