Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Changes in Soil Properties, Bacterial Communities and Wheat Roots Responding to Subsoiling in South Loess Plateau of China

Hanbo Wang; Dasheng Zhang; Jiuxing He; et al.

14
claims
38
verbatim quotes
8
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate effects of subsoiling on the diversity and composition of the bacterial community in a wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China. After the wheat harvest, surface soil samples were collected under two tillage methods (single rotary tillage (RT) and subsoiling + rotary tillage (ST)) to perform high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. Soil properties and root length density (RLD) of winter wheat at booting and flowering stages were also studied. Results showed that ST treatment significantly raised the water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of deep soil (>40 cm), and notably increased the total soil pH, ammonium nitrogen content and RLD in the tillage layer from 0–70 cm at booting stage and 0~100 cm at flowering stage, but the residual nitrate nitrogen significantly decreased by 17.74%. Compared with RT, soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10~20 cm layer of ST treatment showed a significantly decreased trend. The relative abundances of GAL15, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and Serratia in the 10–20 cm layer were remarkably increased in ST. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA) results showed that surface soil pH, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents have the strongest effect on the bacterial structure. In addition, there were positive correlations between the RLD and the relative abundances of Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and the ammonium nitrogen content. In conclusion, although subsoiling was not conducive to improving soil bacterial community richness and diversity, it significantly increased soil beneficial bacteria (biological nitrogen-fixing bacteria, ammonifying bacteria, nitrobacteria) abundances, reduced the nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying bacteria, promoted earlier root development and improved the plant utilization ratio of soil nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ST treatment raised water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of deep soil (>40 cm) relative to single rotary tillage

Treatment
ST treatmente2
Outcome
water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contentse2
Direction
raisede2
Qualifier
deep soil (>40 cm)e2
Comparator
single rotary tillage (RT)e3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“ST treatment significantly raised the water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of deep soil (>40 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“single rotary tillage (RT) and subsoiling + rotary tillage (ST)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST treatment notably increased total soil pH, ammonium nitrogen content and RLD in the tillage layer at booting and flowering stages relative to single rotary tillage

Treatment
ST treatmente2
Outcome
total soil pH, ammonium nitrogen content and RLDe3
Direction
notably increasede3
Qualifier
in the tillage layer from 0–70 cm at booting stage and 0~100 cm at flowering stagee3
Comparator
single rotary tillage (RT)e4
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“ST treatment significantly raised the water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of deep soil (>40 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“notably increased the total soil pH, ammonium nitrogen content and RLD in the tillage layer from 0–70 cm at booting stage and 0~100 cm at flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–835 · show in text ↑
e4

“single rotary tillage (RT) and subsoiling + rotary tillage (ST)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–357 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ST treatment decreased residual nitrate nitrogen in the soil

Treatment
ST treatmente2
Outcome
residual nitrate nitrogene3
Direction
significantly decreasede3
Value
17.74%e3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“ST treatment significantly raised the water storage, organic carbon and total nitrogen contents of deep soil (>40 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–676 · show in text ↑
e3

“but the residual nitrate nitrogen significantly decreased by 17.74%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling (ST) decreased soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10–20 cm layer compared with rotary tillage

Treatment
ST treatmente2
Outcome
soil bacterial richness and diversitye2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
10~20 cm layere2
Comparator
RTe2
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“Compared with RT, soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10~20 cm layer of ST treatment showed a significantly decreased trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST increased the relative abundances of GAL15, Actinobacteria and Nitrospirae in the 10–20 cm layer compared with rotary tillage

Treatment
STe2
Outcome
GAL15, Actinobacteria, Nitrospiraee2
Direction
remarkably increasede2
Qualifier
10–20 cm layere2
Comparator
RTe3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“The relative abundances of GAL15, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and Serratia in the 10–20 cm layer were remarkably increased in ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1211 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with RT, soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10~20 cm layer of ST treatment showed a significantly decreased trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST increased the relative abundances of Rhizobiales and Burkholderiales in the 10–20 cm layer compared with rotary tillage

Treatment
STe2
Outcome
Rhizobiales, Burkholderialese2
Direction
remarkably increasede2
Qualifier
10–20 cm layere2
Comparator
RTe3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“The relative abundances of GAL15, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and Serratia in the 10–20 cm layer were remarkably increased in ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1211 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with RT, soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10~20 cm layer of ST treatment showed a significantly decreased trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ST increased the relative abundances of Pseudomonas and Serratia in the 10–20 cm layer compared with rotary tillage

Treatment
STe2
Outcome
Pseudomonas and Serratiae2
Direction
remarkably increasede2
Qualifier
10–20 cm layere2
Comparator
RTe3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“The relative abundances of GAL15, Actinobacteria, Nitrospirae, Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and Serratia in the 10–20 cm layer were remarkably increased in ST”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1211 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared with RT, soil bacterial richness and diversity in the 10~20 cm layer of ST treatment showed a significantly decreased trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil pH, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents had the strongest effect on the soil bacterial structure in PCA and RDA

Compound
surface soil pH, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogene2
Outcome
bacterial structuree2
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA) results showed that surface soil pH, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen contents have the strongest effect on the bacterial structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1415 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RLD was positively correlated with the relative abundances of Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales and Pseudomonas

Organ / stage
RLDe2
Outcome
Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonase2
Direction
positive correlationse2
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were positive correlations between the RLD and the relative abundances of Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and the ammonium nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1585 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrogen content was positively correlated with the relative abundances of Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales and Pseudomonas

Compound
ammonium nitrogen contente2
Outcome
Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonase2
Direction
positive correlationse2
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“there were positive correlations between the RLD and the relative abundances of Rhizobiales, Burkholderiales, Pseudomonas and the ammonium nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1585 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling significantly increased the abundances of soil beneficial bacteria (nitrogen-fixing, ammonifying and nitrifying bacteria)

Treatment
subsoilinge2
Outcome
soil beneficial bacteriae2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“In conclusion, although subsoiling was not conducive to improving soil bacterial community richness and diversity, it significantly increased soil beneficial bacteria (biological nitrogen-fixing bacteria, ammonifying bacteria, nitrobacteria) abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling reduced the nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying bacteria

Treatment
subsoilinge2
Outcome
nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying bacteriae3
Direction
reducede3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“In conclusion, although subsoiling was not conducive to improving soil bacterial community richness and diversity, it significantly increased soil beneficial bacteria (biological nitrogen-fixing bacteria, ammonifying bacteria, nitrobacteria) abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1839 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduced the nitrogen loss caused by denitrifying bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling promoted earlier root development in wheat

Treatment
subsoilinge2
Outcome
root developmente3
Direction
promotede3
Qualifier
earliere3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“In conclusion, although subsoiling was not conducive to improving soil bacterial community richness and diversity, it significantly increased soil beneficial bacteria (biological nitrogen-fixing bacteria, ammonifying bacteria, nitrobacteria) abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1839 · show in text ↑
e3

“promoted earlier root development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–1933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsoiling improved the plant utilization ratio of soil nutrients

Treatment
subsoilinge2
Outcome
plant utilization ratio of soil nutrientse3
Direction
improvede3
Setting
Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, Chinae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“wheat–maize rotation field in the Guanzhong area of Shaanxi Province, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–204 · show in text ↑
e2

“In conclusion, although subsoiling was not conducive to improving soil bacterial community richness and diversity, it significantly increased soil beneficial bacteria (biological nitrogen-fixing bacteria, ammonifying bacteria, nitrobacteria) abundances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1839 · show in text ↑
e3

“improved the plant utilization ratio of soil nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1938–1992 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

tillage · ecology: diversity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.