Paper · 2002 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

Crop and soil nitrogen status of tilled and no-tillage systems in semiarid regions of Saskatchewan

B G McConkey; D. Curtin; C A Campbell; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
57
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We examined 1990-1996 crop and soil N data for no-tillage (NT), minimum tillage (MT) and conventional tillage (CT) systems from four long-term tillage studies in semiarid regions of Saskatchewan for evidence that the N status was affected by tillage system. On a silt loam and clay soil in the Brown soil zone, spring what (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and protein concentration were lower for NT compared with tilled (CT or MT) systems for a fallow-wheat (F-WM) rotation. Grain protein concentration for continuous wheat (Cont W) was also lower for NT than for MT. For a sandy loam soil in the Brown soil zone, durum (Triticum durum L.) grain protein concentration was similar for MT and NT for both Cont W and F-W, but NT had higher grain yield than MT (P < 0.05 for F-W only). For a loam soil in the Dark Brown soil zone, wheat grain yield for NT was increased by about 7% for fallow-oilseed-wheat (F-O-W) and wheat-oilseed-wheat (W-O-W) rotations. The higher grain yields for NT reduced grain protein concentration by dilution effect as indicated by similar grain N yield. However, at this site, about 23 kg ha -1 more fertilizer N was required for NT than for CT. Elimination of tillage increased total organic N in the upper 7.5 cm of soil and N in surface residues. Our results suggest that a contributing factor to decreased availability of soil N in medium- and fine-textured soils under NT was a slower rate of net N mineralization from organic matter. Soil nitrates to 2.4 m depth did not indicate that nitrate leaching was affected by tillage system. Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan. Key words: Tillage intensity, N availability, soil N fractions, N mineralization, crop residue decomposition, grain protein

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage lowered spring wheat grain yield and protein concentration compared with tilled systems in a fallow-wheat rotation on a silt loam and clay soil.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
NTe1
Outcome
grain yield and protein concentratione1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
fallow-wheat (F-WM) rotatione1
Comparator
tilled (CT or MT) systemse1
Setting
Brown soil zonee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“On a silt loam and clay soil in the Brown soil zone, spring what (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield and protein concentration were lower for NT compared with tilled (CT or MT) systems for a fallow-wheat (F-WM) rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–476 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage lowered grain protein concentration of continuous wheat compared with minimum tillage.

Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
Grain protein concentratione2
Direction
lowere2
Qualifier
continuous wheat (Cont W)e2
Comparator
MTe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Grain protein concentration for continuous wheat (Cont W) was also lower for NT than for MT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum grain protein concentration was similar under minimum and no-tillage.

Treatment
NTe3
Outcome
grain protein concentratione3
Direction
similare3
Qualifier
for both Cont W and F-We3
Comparator
MTe3
Setting
Brown soil zonee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“For a sandy loam soil in the Brown soil zone, durum (Triticum durum L.) grain protein concentration was similar for MT and NT for both Cont W and F-W”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage gave higher durum grain yield than minimum tillage for fallow-wheat only.

Treatment
NTe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Qualifier
P < 0.05 for F-W onlye4
Comparator
MTe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“For a sandy loam soil in the Brown soil zone, durum (Triticum durum L.) grain protein concentration was similar for MT and NT for both Cont W and F-W”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–720 · show in text ↑
e4

“but NT had higher grain yield than MT (P < 0.05 for F-W only)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased wheat grain yield by about 7% in fallow-oilseed-wheat and wheat-oilseed-wheat rotations.

Treatment
NTe5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
about 7%e5
Qualifier
for fallow-oilseed-wheat (F-O-W) and wheat-oilseed-wheat (W-O-W) rotationse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“wheat grain yield for NT was increased by about 7% for fallow-oilseed-wheat (F-O-W) and wheat-oilseed-wheat (W-O-W) rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–955 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher no-tillage grain yield reduced grain protein concentration by a dilution effect.

Treatment
NTe6
Outcome
grain protein concentratione6
Direction
reducede6
Qualifier
by dilution effect as indicated by similar grain N yielde6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑
e6

“The higher grain yields for NT reduced grain protein concentration by dilution effect as indicated by similar grain N yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage required about 23 kg ha -1 more fertilizer N than conventional tillage.

Treatment
NTe7
Outcome
fertilizer Ne7
Direction
moree7
Value
23 kg ha -1e7
Comparator
CTe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, at this site, about 23 kg ha -1 more fertilizer N was required for NT than for CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elimination of tillage increased total organic N in the upper soil and N in surface residues.

Treatment
Elimination of tillagee2
Outcome
total organic N in the upper 7.5 cm of soil and N in surface residuese2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elimination of tillage increased total organic N in the upper 7.5 cm of soil and N in surface residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage system did not show an effect on soil nitrate leaching to 2.4 m depth.

Treatment
tillage systeme2
Outcome
nitrate leachinge2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil nitrates to 2.4 m depth did not indicate that nitrate leaching was affected by tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1566 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A slower rate of net N mineralization from organic matter is a likely cause of decreased soil N availability under no-tillage.

Treatment
NTe2
Outcome
availability of soil Ne2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
a slower rate of net N mineralization from organic mattere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑
e2

“a contributing factor to decreased availability of soil N in medium- and fine-textured soils under NT was a slower rate of net N mineralization from organic matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1466 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Current fertilizer N recommendations for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum wheat production under no-tillage in semiarid Saskatchewan.

Outcome
optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain proteine1
Qualifier
may be inadequatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Current fertilizer N recommendations developed for tilled systems may be inadequate for optimum production of wheat with acceptable grain protein under NT is semiarid regions of Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1758 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

tillage · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 55 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.