Paper · 2017 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Fungal Communities in Rhizosphere Soil under Conservation Tillage Shift in Response to Plant Growth

Ziting Wang; Tong Li; Xiaoxia Wen; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
111
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Conservation tillage is an extensively used agricultural practice in northern China that alters soil texture and nutrient conditions, causing changes in the soil microbial community. However, how conservation tillage affects rhizosphere and bulk soil fungal communities during plant growth remains unclear. The present study investigated the effect of long-term (6 years) conservation (chisel plow, zero) and conventional (plow) tillage during wheat growth on the rhizosphere fungal community, using high-throughput sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene and quantitative PCR. During tillering, fungal alpha diversity in both rhizosphere and bulk soil were significantly higher under zero tillage compared to other methods. Although tillage had no significant effect during the flowering stage, fungal alpha diversity at this stage was significantly different between rhizosphere and bulk soils, with bulk soil presenting the highest diversity. This was also reflected in the phylogenetic structure of the communities, as rhizosphere soil communities underwent a greater shift from tillering to flowering compared to bulk soil communities. In general, less variation in community structure was observed under zero tillage compared to plow and chisel plow treatments. Changes in the relative abundance of the fungal orders Capnodiales, Pleosporales, and Xylariales contributed the highest to the dissimilarities observed. Structural equation models revealed that the soil fungal communities under the three tillage regimes were likely influenced by the changes in soil properties associated with plant growth. This study suggested that: (1) differences in nutrient resources between rhizosphere and bulk soils can select for different types of fungi thereby increasing community variation during plant growth; (2) tillage can alter fungal communities' variability, with zero tillage promoting more stable communities. This work suggests that long-term changes in tillage regimes may result in unique soil fungal ecology, which might influence other aspects of soil functioning (e.g., decomposition).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At tillering, zero tillage had higher fungal alpha diversity in rhizosphere and bulk soil than other methods.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
fungal alpha diversitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During tillering, fungal alpha diversity in both rhizosphere and bulk soil were significantly higher under zero tillage compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–740 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage had no significant effect on fungal alpha diversity during flowering.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
tillagee0
Outcome
fungal alpha diversitye1
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tillage had no significant effect during the flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–811 · show in text ↑
e1

“fungal alpha diversity at this stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–849 · show in text ↑
e2

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, bulk soil had higher fungal alpha diversity than rhizosphere soil.

Outcome
fungal alpha diversitye0
Direction
highest diversitye0
Comparator
rhizospheree0
Setting
bulk soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal alpha diversity at this stage was significantly different between rhizosphere and bulk soils, with bulk soil presenting the highest diversity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere fungal communities shifted more from tillering to flowering than bulk soil communities.

Organ / stage
tillering to floweringe0
Outcome
communitiese0
Direction
greater shifte0
Comparator
bulk soil communitiese0
Setting
rhizosphere soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere soil communities underwent a greater shift from tillering to flowering compared to bulk soil communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1156 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had less variation in fungal community structure than plow and chisel plow.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
variation in community structuree0
Direction
less variatione0
Comparator
plow and chisel plow treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less variation in community structure was observed under zero tillage compared to plow and chisel plow treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in abundance of three fungal orders contributed most to observed dissimilarity.

Outcome
dissimilaritiese0
Qualifier
Capnodiales, Pleosporales, and Xylarialese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in the relative abundance of the fungal orders Capnodiales, Pleosporales, and Xylariales contributed the highest to the dissimilarities observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Models suggested soil property changes associated with plant growth influenced fungal communities under all three tillage regimes.

Treatment
three tillage regimese0
Outcome
soil fungal communitiese0
Qualifier
likely influencede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil fungal communities under the three tillage regimes were likely influenced by the changes in soil properties associated with plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1625 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in rhizosphere and bulk soil nutrients were suggested to select different fungi.

Outcome
community variatione0
Qualifier
differences in nutrient resources between rhizosphere and bulk soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences in nutrient resources between rhizosphere and bulk soils can select for different types of fungi thereby increasing community variation during plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1825 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage was suggested to promote more stable fungal communities.

Treatment
zero tillagee0
Outcome
more stable communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zero tillage promoting more stable communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–1933 · show in text ↑
e1

“during wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–456 · show in text ↑

tillage · ecology: diversity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.