Abstract
Edible coatings, applied to food before convective drying, could preserve the sensory and nutritional properties of dehydrated products. The effect of an edible coating of HPMC with natural extracts was studied on the color change and antioxidant content of dehydrated apple slices. The HPMC coating did not affect the water loss during the drying and favored a high retention of total phenolic compounds (TPC). The white index (WI) was significantly higher in sample with HPMC than those without coating. The combination of HPMC coating with extracts preserve the color and TPC compared to the only use of HPMC or extracts.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
HPMC coating did not affect water loss during drying.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- HPMC coatinge0
- Outcome
- water losse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The HPMC coating did not affect the water loss during the drying”
t0“apple slices”
Claim · model-written summary
HPMC coating favored retention of total phenolic compounds.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- HPMC coatinge0
- Outcome
- retention of total phenolic compounds (TPC)e0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The HPMC coating did not affect the water loss during the drying and favored a high retention of total phenolic compounds (TPC)”
t0“apple slices”
Claim · model-written summary
HPMC coated slices had a significantly higher white index than uncoated slices.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- HPMCe0
- Outcome
- white index (WI)e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- without coatinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The white index (WI) was significantly higher in sample with HPMC than those without coating”
t0“apple slices”
Claim · model-written summary
HPMC combined with extracts preserved color relative to either alone.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- combination of HPMC coating with extractse0
- Outcome
- colore0
- Direction
- preservee0
- Comparator
- only use of HPMC or extractse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of HPMC coating with extracts preserve the color and TPC compared to the only use of HPMC or extracts”
t0“apple slices”
Claim · model-written summary
HPMC combined with extracts preserved total phenolics relative to either alone.
- Taxon
- appleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- combination of HPMC coating with extractse0
- Outcome
- TPCe0
- Direction
- preservee0
- Comparator
- only use of HPMC or extractse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The combination of HPMC coating with extracts preserve the color and TPC compared to the only use of HPMC or extracts”
t0“apple slices”
The same questions in other papers
storage · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →botanical · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →storage · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
114 papers more in this group
See all 118 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.