Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Fate of Apple Peel Phenolics during Cool Storage

John B. Golding; W. Barry McGlasson; S. Grant Wyllie; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
92
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Consumption of certain phenolics in the diet is considered beneficial to human health. In this study, individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months. The concentrations of total phenolics significantly differed among the cultivars examined, with Lady Williams peel having significantly more phenolics (over 4000 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight) than Crofton (2668 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight) and Granny Smith, which had the lowest concentration of total phenolics (1275 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight). There were also significant differences in individual phenolics among cultivars and during storage. Quercetin glycosides were the only flavonols identified, with quercetin rhamnoglucoside being the most abundant phenolic in the peel. Chlorogenic acid was the major cinnamic acid derivative, with high concentrations, up to 412 microg x g(-1)) peel fresh weight, in Crofton peel. A pre-storage diphenylamine (DPA) treatment had few significant effects on peel phenolic metabolism. Where differences did occur, fruit treated with DPA retained higher concentrations of total peel phenolics during storage than fruit not treated with DPA. Storage of all cultivars for up to 9 months in air at 0 degrees C induced few significant changes in the peel phenolic concentrations. This indicates that phenolic metabolism in apple peel is relatively stable, and the health benefits of phenolics in apple peel should be maintained during long-term storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lady Williams apple peel had significantly more total phenolics than Crofton peel.

Material
Lady Williamse0
Organ / stage
peele0
Outcome
total phenolicse0
Direction
moree0
Value
over 4000 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weighte0
Comparator
Croftone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of total phenolics significantly differed among the cultivars examined, with Lady Williams peel having significantly more phenolics (over 4000 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight) than Crofton (2668 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–541 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granny Smith apple peel had the lowest total phenolics concentration, 1275 microg per g fresh weight.

Material
Granny Smithe2
Organ / stage
peele2
Outcome
total phenolicse2
Direction
loweste2
Value
1275 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weighte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“and Granny Smith, which had the lowest concentration of total phenolics (1275 microg x g(-1) peel fresh weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–653 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercetin glycosides were the only flavonols identified in apple peel.

Organ / stage
peele1
Compound
Quercetin glycosidese3
Outcome
flavonols identifiede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Quercetin glycosides were the only flavonols identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercetin rhamnoglucoside was the most abundant phenolic in apple peel.

Organ / stage
peele4
Compound
quercetin rhamnoglucosidee4
Outcome
most abundant phenolice4
Direction
most abundante4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“with quercetin rhamnoglucoside being the most abundant phenolic in the peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–887 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorogenic acid was the major cinnamic acid derivative in apple peel.

Compound
Chlorogenic acide5
Outcome
major cinnamic acid derivativee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Chlorogenic acid was the major cinnamic acid derivative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorogenic acid reached concentrations of up to 412 microg per g fresh weight in Crofton peel.

Material
Croftone6
Organ / stage
peele6
Compound
Chlorogenic acide5
Outcome
concentrationse6
Value
up to 412 microg x g(-1)) peel fresh weighte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“with high concentrations, up to 412 microg x g(-1)) peel fresh weight, in Crofton peel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1032 · show in text ↑
e5

“Chlorogenic acid was the major cinnamic acid derivative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-storage DPA treatment had few significant effects on apple peel phenolic metabolism.

Organ / stage
peele7
Treatment
pre-storage diphenylamine (DPA) treatmente7
Outcome
peel phenolic metabolisme7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“A pre-storage diphenylamine (DPA) treatment had few significant effects on peel phenolic metabolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1133 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DPA-treated apple fruit retained higher total peel phenolic concentrations during storage than untreated fruit.

Organ / stage
peele2
Treatment
DPAe2
Outcome
total peel phenolicse2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
fruit not treated with DPAe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Where differences did occur, fruit treated with DPA retained higher concentrations of total peel phenolics during storage than fruit not treated with DPA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1288 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage for up to 9 months in air at 0 degrees C induced few significant changes in apple peel phenolic concentrations.

Organ / stage
peele2
Treatment
Storage of all cultivars for up to 9 months in air at 0 degrees Ce2
Outcome
peel phenolic concentrationse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Storage of all cultivars for up to 9 months in air at 0 degrees C induced few significant changes in the peel phenolic concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1423 · show in text ↑
e1

“individual phenolics were measured by diode-array HPLC at monthly intervals in the peel of Granny Smith, Lady Williams, and Crofton apple cultivars stored in air at 0 degrees C for 9 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–291 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors interpret phenolic metabolism in apple peel as relatively stable during long-term storage.

Organ / stage
peele2
Outcome
phenolic metabolisme2
Qualifier
relatively stablee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“This indicates that phenolic metabolism in apple peel is relatively stable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1425–1499 · show in text ↑

diphenylamine · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.