Paper · 2001 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Activity and Concentration of Polyphenolic Antioxidants in Apple: Effect of Cultivar, Harvest Year, and Storage Conditions

Addie A. van der Sluis; Matthijs Dekker; Anton de Jager; et al.

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
398
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Consumers' increasing interest in the relationship between diet and health is a sign for food producers to pay more attention to potential health-protecting compounds in new product development and food processing. From a production chain perspective the choice of the raw material that is used is important for the health-protecting potential of the end product. Four apple cultivars (Jonagold, Golden Delicious, Cox's Orange, and Elstar), which can be used as fresh apples or in processed apple products, were compared with regard to flavonol, catechins, phloridzin, and chlorogenic acid concentrations and antioxidant activity. Jonagold apples possessed the highest flavonoid concentration and the highest antioxidant activity. To study seasonal differences, apples from three different harvest years were analyzed, but in three cultivars no effect on flavonoid concentration and antioxidant activity was observed. Long-term storage, both at refrigerator temperature and under controlled atmosphere conditions, was found not to influence flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold apples had the highest flavonoid concentration.

Material
Jonagolde0
Outcome
flavonoid concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jonagold apples possessed the highest flavonoid concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–692 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jonagold apples had the highest antioxidant activity.

Material
Jonagolde0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Jonagold apples possessed the highest flavonoid concentration and the highest antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–729 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three harvest years, flavonoid concentration did not change in three cultivars.

Outcome
flavonoid concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
three cultivarse0
Setting
three different harvest yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apples from three different harvest years were analyzed, but in three cultivars no effect on flavonoid concentration and antioxidant activity was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–916 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across three harvest years, antioxidant activity did not change in three cultivars.

Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
three cultivarse0
Setting
three different harvest yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“apples from three different harvest years were analyzed, but in three cultivars no effect on flavonoid concentration and antioxidant activity was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Refrigerator storage did not alter flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activity.

Treatment
refrigerator temperaturee0
Outcome
flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activitye0
Direction
not to influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage, both at refrigerator temperature and under controlled atmosphere conditions, was found not to influence flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-atmosphere storage did not alter flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activity.

Treatment
controlled atmosphere conditionse0
Outcome
flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activitye0
Direction
not to influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term storage, both at refrigerator temperature and under controlled atmosphere conditions, was found not to influence flavonoid concentration or antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 20 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.