Paper · 2014

Shelf-life exten Sion of f re Sh-cut Apple c ube S with

Stoil Zhelyazkov; Gábor Zsivánovits; Boryana Brashlyanova; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ZhelyaZkov, S., G. ZSivanovitS, B. BraShlyanova and M. Marudova-ZSivanovitS, 2014. Shelf-life extension of fresh-cut apple cubes with chitosan coating. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 20: 536-540 the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples was investigated in this research. Manually sliced apples were treated with solutions of 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 g.kg -1 chitosan in acetic acid and then stored at 4°C for 17 days. Physical, physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of the samples were monitored during the storage period. it was found that chitosan coatings inhibited the growth of microorganisms and affected significantly and positively the storage time of the products. Changes in the sensory qualities of taste were evaluated. a chitosan coating retarded water loss and the drop in sensory quality, increasing the soluble solid content and titratable acidity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating inhibited microorganism growth on fresh-cut apples.

Treatment
chitosan coatingse0
Outcome
growth of microorganismse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan coatings inhibited the growth of microorganisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–614 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating significantly and positively affected storage time.

Treatment
chitosan coatinge1
Outcome
storage timee0
Direction
positivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“affected significantly and positively the storage time of the products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating retarded water loss.

Treatment
chitosan coatinge0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a chitosan coating retarded water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating retarded the decline in sensory quality.

Treatment
chitosan coatinge0
Outcome
drop in sensory qualitye0
Direction
retardede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a chitosan coating retarded water loss and the drop in sensory quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating increased soluble solid content.

Treatment
chitosan coatinge1
Outcome
soluble solid contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the soluble solid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating increased titratable acidity.

Treatment
chitosan coatinge1
Outcome
titratable aciditye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the soluble solid content and titratable acidity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“the possible use of chitosan coating on fresh-cut apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–242 · show in text ↑

chitosan · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chitosan · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

storage · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 21 positive, 17 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

storage · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 36 positive, 10 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.