Abstract
This field experiment on the evaluation of insecticides against cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana) during kharif 2019. Based on mean of both sprays, the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves). Imidacloprid 17.8%SL @ 100 ml ha-1, thiacloprid 21.7% SC @ 125 ml ha-1, thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 100 g ha-1 and buprofezin 25% SC @ 1000 ml ha-1 were moderately effective. Insecticide sprays reduced the occurrence of natural enemies (spiders, coccinellids and Chrysoperla) only insignificantly. The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1). The incremental cost-benefit ratio was maximum with imidacloprid (1:6.36) followed by thiacloprid (1:5.64), thiamethoxam (1:5.29), monocrotophos (1:4.74), dinotefuran (1:4.38), flonicamid (1:3.99), buprofezin (1:3.86) and diafenthiuron (1:3.19).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 had 0.84 nymphs per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- Cotton
Gossypium hirsutumt0 - Treatment
- flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- nymphse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 0.84 nymphse0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 had 1.73 adults/3 leaves per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- adultse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 1.73 adults/3 leavese0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 had 1.49 nymphs per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- nymphse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 1.49 nymphse0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 had 2.06 adults/3 leaves per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- adultse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 2.06 adults/3 leavese0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 had 1.65 nymphs per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- nymphse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 1.65 nymphse0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 had 2.25 adults/3 leaves per three leaves in the mean of two sprays, among the lowest leafhopper counts.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- adultse0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Value
- 2.25 adults/3 leavese0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“the least counts of nymphs and adults was observed with flonicamid 50%WG @ 150 g ha-1 (0.84 nymphs and 1.73 adults/3 leaves) followed by dinotefuran 20%SG @ 150 g ha-1 (1.49 nymphs and 2.06 adults/3 leaves) and diafenthiuron 50%WP @ 500 g ha-1 (1.65 nymphs and 2.25 adults/3 leaves)”
Claim · model-written summary
flonicamid yielded 21.60 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- flonicamide0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 21.60 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
dinotefuran yielded 20.99 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- dinotefurane0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 20.99 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
diafenthiuron yielded 20.71 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- diafenthiurone0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 20.71 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
imidacloprid yielded 20.41 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 20.41 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
thiacloprid yielded 20.12 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- thiaclopride0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 20.12 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
buprofezin yielded 19.87 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- buprofezine0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 19.87 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
thiamethoxam yielded 19.83 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxame0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 19.83 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
monocrotophos yielded 19.37 q ha-1 of seed cotton.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- monocrotophose0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 19.37 q ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The maximum seed cotton yield was obtained with flonicamid (21.60 q ha-1) followed by dinotefuran (20.99 q ha-1), diafenthiuron (20.71 q ha-1), imidacloprid (20.41 q ha-1), thiacloprid (20.12 q ha-1), buprofezin (19.87 q ha-1), thiamethoxam (19.83 q ha-1) and monocrotophos (19.37 q ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four insecticides were moderately effective against cotton leafhopper.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Imidacloprid 17.8%SL @ 100 ml ha-1, thiacloprid 21.7% SC @ 125 ml ha-1, thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 100 g ha-1 and buprofezin 25% SC @ 1000 ml ha-1e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
- Outcome
- moderately effectivee0
- Direction
- moderately effectivee0
- Setting
- Hisar (Haryana)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e1“cotton leafhopper Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida) in Gossypium hirsutum L. was conducted at Hisar (Haryana)”
e0“Imidacloprid 17.8%SL @ 100 ml ha-1, thiacloprid 21.7% SC @ 125 ml ha-1, thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 100 g ha-1 and buprofezin 25% SC @ 1000 ml ha-1 were moderately effective.”
Claim · model-written summary
Insecticide sprays reduced natural enemy occurrence insignificantly.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- Insecticide sprayse0
- Outcome
- occurrence of natural enemiese0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“Insecticide sprays reduced the occurrence of natural enemies (spiders, coccinellids and Chrysoperla) only insignificantly.”
Claim · model-written summary
imidacloprid had an incremental cost-benefit ratio of 1:6.36.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- imidaclopride0
- Outcome
- incremental cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 1:6.36e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The incremental cost-benefit ratio was maximum with imidacloprid (1:6.36) followed by thiacloprid (1:5.64), thiamethoxam (1:5.29), monocrotophos (1:4.74), dinotefuran (1:4.38), flonicamid (1:3.99), buprofezin (1:3.86) and diafenthiuron (1:3.19)”
Claim · model-written summary
thiacloprid had an incremental cost-benefit ratio of 1:5.64.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- thiaclopride0
- Outcome
- incremental cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1:5.64e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The incremental cost-benefit ratio was maximum with imidacloprid (1:6.36) followed by thiacloprid (1:5.64), thiamethoxam (1:5.29), monocrotophos (1:4.74), dinotefuran (1:4.38), flonicamid (1:3.99), buprofezin (1:3.86) and diafenthiuron (1:3.19)”
Claim · model-written summary
thiamethoxam had an incremental cost-benefit ratio of 1:5.29.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- thiamethoxame0
- Outcome
- incremental cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1:5.29e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The incremental cost-benefit ratio was maximum with imidacloprid (1:6.36) followed by thiacloprid (1:5.64), thiamethoxam (1:5.29), monocrotophos (1:4.74), dinotefuran (1:4.38), flonicamid (1:3.99), buprofezin (1:3.86) and diafenthiuron (1:3.19)”
Claim · model-written summary
monocrotophos had an incremental cost-benefit ratio of 1:4.74.
- Taxon
- CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
- Treatment
- monocrotophose0
- Outcome
- incremental cost-benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- followed bye0
- Value
- 1:4.74e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Cotton”
e0“The incremental cost-benefit ratio was maximum with imidacloprid (1:6.36) followed by thiacloprid (1:5.64), thiamethoxam (1:5.29), monocrotophos (1:4.74), dinotefuran (1:4.38), flonicamid (1:3.99), buprofezin (1:3.86) and diafenthiuron (1:3.19)”
The same questions in other papers
monocrotophos · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →thiamethoxam · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →thiacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiacloprid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
buprofezin · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
diafenthiuron · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.