Paper · 1982 · Tropical Pest Management

Field evaluation of some new ultra‐low‐volume (u.l.v.) insecticides for rainfed cotton in the Niger State of Nigeria

A. B. Chaudhry

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field trials were conducted at Kontagora and Mokwa in the Guinea savanna zone of Nigeria to evaluate the relative efficiency of u.l.v. formulations of insecticides and conventional spraying methods for improving cotton yield. Endosulfan and monocrotophos were applied at the rate of 3 //ha using a battery‐operated Ulva micron sprayer. Monocrotophos gave an increased cotton yield of 938.5 and 1235.5 kg seed cotton/ha in the 1975–76 and 1976–77 seasons, respectively, when compared with controls. In the same way, endosulfan gave increased yields of 670.0 and 714.5 kg/ha. Carbaryl, applied at the rate of 1.1 kg w.p./ha using a knapsack sprayer, resulted in increased yields of 587.0 and 763.5 kg/ha, respectively. it is concluded that monocrotophos u.l.v. is the most effective insecticide, and that spraying is a prerequisite for an economical cotton crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos increased cotton yield by 938.5 in 1975–76.

Treatment
Monocrotophose0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
938.5e0
Qualifier
1975–76e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocrotophos gave an increased cotton yield of 938.5 and 1235.5 kg seed cotton/ha in the 1975–76 and 1976–77 seasons, respectively, when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos increased cotton yield by 1235.5 kg seed cotton/ha in 1976–77.

Treatment
Monocrotophose0
Outcome
cotton yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1235.5 kg seed cotton/hae0
Qualifier
1976–77e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Monocrotophos gave an increased cotton yield of 938.5 and 1235.5 kg seed cotton/ha in the 1975–76 and 1976–77 seasons, respectively, when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–505 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

endosulfan increased cotton yield by 670.0 in 1975–76.

Treatment
endosulfane0
Outcome
cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
670.0e0
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endosulfan gave increased yields of 670.0 and 714.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“for improving cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–233 · show in text ↑
e2

“when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

endosulfan increased cotton yield by 714.5 kg/ha in 1976–77.

Treatment
endosulfane0
Outcome
cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
714.5 kg/hae0
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“endosulfan gave increased yields of 670.0 and 714.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“for improving cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–233 · show in text ↑
e2

“when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl increased cotton yield by 587.0 in 1975–76.

Treatment
Carbaryle0
Outcome
cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
587.0e0
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbaryl, applied at the rate of 1.1 kg w.p./ha using a knapsack sprayer, resulted in increased yields of 587.0 and 763.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“for improving cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–233 · show in text ↑
e2

“when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbaryl increased cotton yield by 763.5 kg/ha in 1976–77.

Treatment
Carbaryle0
Outcome
cotton yielde1
Direction
increasede0
Value
763.5 kg/hae0
Comparator
controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbaryl, applied at the rate of 1.1 kg w.p./ha using a knapsack sprayer, resulted in increased yields of 587.0 and 763.5 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“for improving cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–233 · show in text ↑
e2

“when compared with controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–505 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude monocrotophos u.l.v. is most effective.

Outcome
monocrotophos u.l.v. is the most effective insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“monocrotophos u.l.v. is the most effective insecticide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“rainfed cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude spraying is necessary for an economical cotton crop.

Outcome
spraying is a prerequisite for an economical cotton crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying is a prerequisite for an economical cotton crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–868 · show in text ↑

endosulfan · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

monocrotophos · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

carbaryl · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.