Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Evaluation of some Novel Mode of Insecticides against Cotton Jassid (Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida) in New Alluvial Zone of West Bengal

Pronobesh Halder; Madhab Kumar Datta; Sourav Basak

5
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in two crop seasons during 2014 and 2015 at Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, West Bengal to evaluate the efficacy of some novel mode of insecticides like Buprofezin 25% SC, Flonicamid 50% WG, Spiromesifen 22.9% SC, Spirotetramat 240 SC, Sulfoxaflor 24% SC, Clothianidin 50% WDG, Dinotefuran 20% SG along with some standard chemicals, Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l and Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 0.3 gm/l against Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi. Nine numbers of insecticides with untreated control, altogether ten treatments replicated three times were done in the experiment. Results revealed that all the treated plots gave significant reduction of jassid population while there was a sharp increase in pest population in the untreated control. Among the treatments, the most effective insecticide was Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/l (80.16%) followed by Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l (78.77%) and least effective was Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/l (69.45%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All insecticide-treated cotton plots significantly reduced jassid population.

Material
Surabhie1
Treatment
treated plotse0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
Outcome
jassid populatione0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the treated plots gave significant reduction of jassid population while there was a sharp increase in pest population in the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated cotton plots had a sharp increase in pest population.

Treatment
untreated controle0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae1pest
Outcome
pest populatione0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a sharp increase in pest population in the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/l reduced cotton jassids by 80.16%.

Treatment
Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/le0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae2pest
Outcome
jassid populatione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
80.16%e0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/l (80.16%) followed by Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l (78.77%) and least effective was Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/l (69.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nine numbers of insecticides with untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–588 · show in text ↑
e2

“Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
e3

“all the treated plots gave significant reduction of jassid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l reduced cotton jassids by 78.77%.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/le0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae2pest
Outcome
jassid populatione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
78.77%e0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/l (80.16%) followed by Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l (78.77%) and least effective was Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/l (69.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nine numbers of insecticides with untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–588 · show in text ↑
e2

“Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
e3

“all the treated plots gave significant reduction of jassid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/l reduced cotton jassids by 69.45%.

Treatment
Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/le0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae2pest
Outcome
jassid populatione3
Direction
reductione3
Value
69.45%e0
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Buprofezin 25% SC @ 1.6 ml/l (80.16%) followed by Imidacloprid 17.8% SL @ 0.5 ml/l (78.77%) and least effective was Sulfoxaflor 24% SC @ 0.3ml/l (69.45%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nine numbers of insecticides with untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–588 · show in text ↑
e2

“Jassid [Amrasca biguttula biguttula (Ishida)] infesting cotton variety Surabhi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–535 · show in text ↑
e3

“all the treated plots gave significant reduction of jassid population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–759 · show in text ↑

buprofezin · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.