Paper · 2009 · Pesticide Research Journal

Efficacy of different seed dressers against early season sucking pest of cotton.

B.B. Bhosle; D. G. More; Neetin Ramdas Patange; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Thiamethoxam and other seed dressers were evaluated against the sucking pests of cotton. The replicated field experiment was conducted with eight treatments at Dhanegaon Farm, Cotton Research Station, Nanded during Kharif 2002–03, 2003–04 and 2004–05. Observations were recorded on aphids, jassids, thrips and the natural enemies like lady bird beetles and the chrysoperla spp. Results clearly pinpointed that thiamethoxam 350 FS @ 3 g ai kg−1 seed was the best treatement in controlling the early season sucking pests of cotton and bringing out the best cost benefit ratio of 1:1.63.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 350 FS at 3 g ai per kg seed was the best treatment for controlling early-season sucking pests of cotton among the seed dressers tested.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 350 FS @ 3 g ai kg−1 seede2
Interactor
sucking pestse2pest
Outcome
controlling the early season sucking pests of cottone2
Direction
beste2
Comparator
other seed dresserse0
Setting
Dhanegaon Farm, Cotton Research Station, Nandede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam and other seed dressers were evaluated against the sucking pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The replicated field experiment was conducted with eight treatments at Dhanegaon Farm, Cotton Research Station, Nanded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–207 · show in text ↑
e2

“thiamethoxam 350 FS @ 3 g ai kg−1 seed was the best treatement in controlling the early season sucking pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 350 FS at 3 g ai per kg seed gave the best cost-benefit ratio of 1:1.63 in cotton.

Treatment
thiamethoxam 350 FS @ 3 g ai kg−1 seede2
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe3
Direction
beste3
Value
1:1.63e3
Comparator
other seed dresserse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam and other seed dressers were evaluated against the sucking pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“thiamethoxam 350 FS @ 3 g ai kg−1 seed was the best treatement in controlling the early season sucking pests of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–528 · show in text ↑
e3

“bringing out the best cost benefit ratio of 1:1.63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–583 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiamethoxam · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.