Paper · 2020 · Crop and Pasture Science

Assessment of foliar-applied phosphorus fertiliser formulations to enhance phosphorus nutrition and grain production in wheat

Therese M. McBeath; Evelina Facelli; Courtney A. E. Peirce; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The ability to utilise foliar-applied phosphorus (P) as a strategy to increase the P status and yield of grain crops grown in dryland regions with variable climates is attractive. Several P formulations with varying pH, accompanying cations and adjuvants were tested for their effectiveness as foliar fertilisers for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants, first under controlled and then under field conditions. Experiments under controlled conditions suggested that several formulations with specific chemistries offered promise with respect to wheat fertiliser-P recovery and biomass responses. These formulations were then evaluated in two field experiments, and although wheat grown at the sites showed substantive responses to soil-applied P, there was no significant grain-yield response to foliar-applied P. Following the limited responses to foliar-applied fertiliser in the field, we used an isotopic dilution technique to test the hypothesis that the variation in responses of wheat to foliar addition of P could be explained by a mechanism of substitution, whereby root P uptake is downregulated when P is taken up through the leaves, but this was proven not to be the case. We conclude that foliar P application cannot be used as a tactical fertiliser application to boost grain yield of wheat in dryland regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several foliar P formulations offered promise for wheat P recovery and biomass responses under controlled conditions

Treatment
formulations with specific chemistriese1
Outcome
fertiliser-P recovery and biomass responsese1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Qualifier
offered promisee1
Setting
controlled conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“several formulations with specific chemistries offered promise with respect to wheat fertiliser-P recovery and biomass responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“Experiments under controlled conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–449 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat at the field sites showed substantive responses to soil-applied P

Treatment
soil-applied Pe4
Outcome
substantive responsese4
Direction
increaseinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“wheat grown at the sites showed substantive responses to soil-applied P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied P gave no significant grain-yield response in wheat in two field experiments

Treatment
foliar-applied Pe3
Outcome
grain-yield responsee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Setting
two field experimentse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“there was no significant grain-yield response to foliar-applied P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–811 · show in text ↑
e4

“wheat grown at the sites showed substantive responses to soil-applied P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–744 · show in text ↑
e5

“These formulations were then evaluated in two field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar P addition did not downregulate root P uptake in wheat (isotopic dilution test of the substitution hypothesis)

Treatment
foliar addition of Pe6
Outcome
root P uptakee6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“we used an isotopic dilution technique to test the hypothesis that the variation in responses of wheat to foliar addition of P could be explained by a mechanism of substitution, whereby root P uptake is downregulated when P is taken up through the leaves, but this was proven not to be the case”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1182 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar P application should not be used to boost wheat grain yield in dryland regions

Treatment
foliar P applicatione7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Setting
dryland regionse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“We conclude that foliar P application cannot be used as a tactical fertiliser application to boost grain yield of wheat in dryland regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1322 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.