Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management

Effect of Tillage and Mulching on Growth, Yield and Economics of Maize Crops

Pramod Kumar; Suman Lata; Swapnil -; et al.

15
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiments were conducted during July to October, 2017, 2018 and 2019 in split plot design was laid out at Zonal Research Station farm, Chianki, Palamu, Jharkhand, India. The cultural practices included two factors i.e. the first factor included conventional tillage (CT), minimum tillage (MT), raised bed sowing (RBS), the second factor included without mulch (WM), farm waste mulch (FWM), polythene mulch (PM), soil mulch (SM). The rain water use efficiency was higher in raised bed sowing+polythene mulch (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) than the other treatments but it was lowest in MT+WM (2.96 kg ha-1 mm-1) over the three years. The high water use efficiency in the year 2019 (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) influences the maximum growth and yield (5,169 kg ha-1)of the crop followed by 2018 (4.74 kg ha-1 mm-1) but the minimum yield was found under minimum tillage without mulch in every year. This higher growth leads to higher stover yield and plastic mulch prevents the weeding cost which finally improved the B:C ratio (1.97) by reducing cost of cultivation and improving net return. In conclusion, minimum tillage without mulch is not recommended under dryland condition but raise bed sowing with plastic mulch is a suitable practice among all practices. This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised bed sowing with polythene mulch had higher rain water use efficiency than other treatments, at 5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
raised bed sowing+polythene mulche0
Outcome
rain water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1e0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rain water use efficiency was higher in raised bed sowing+polythene mulch (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) than the other treatments but it was lowest in MT+WM (2.96 kg ha-1 mm-1) over the three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage without mulch had the lowest rain water use efficiency, at 2.96 kg ha-1 mm-1.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
MT+WMe0
Outcome
rain water use efficiencye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.96 kg ha-1 mm-1e0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rain water use efficiency was higher in raised bed sowing+polythene mulch (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) than the other treatments but it was lowest in MT+WM (2.96 kg ha-1 mm-1) over the three years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2019 crop had maximum yield of 5,169 kg ha-1 alongside high water use efficiency.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
maximum growth and yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
5,169 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
2018e0
Setting
2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high water use efficiency in the year 2019 (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) influences the maximum growth and yield (5,169 kg ha-1)of the crop followed by 2018 (4.74 kg ha-1 mm-1) but the minimum yield was found under minimum tillage without mulch in every year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage without mulch had the minimum yield each year.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
minimum tillage without mulche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Qualifier
in every yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The high water use efficiency in the year 2019 (5.71 kg ha-1 mm-1) influences the maximum growth and yield (5,169 kg ha-1)of the crop followed by 2018 (4.74 kg ha-1 mm-1) but the minimum yield was found under minimum tillage without mulch in every year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher growth was associated with higher stover yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This higher growth leads to higher stover yield and plastic mulch prevents the weeding cost which finally improved the B:C ratio (1.97) by reducing cost of cultivation and improving net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch prevented weeding cost.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
weeding coste0
Direction
preventse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This higher growth leads to higher stover yield and plastic mulch prevents the weeding cost which finally improved the B:C ratio (1.97) by reducing cost of cultivation and improving net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch improved the benefit to cost ratio to 1.97.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1.97e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This higher growth leads to higher stover yield and plastic mulch prevents the weeding cost which finally improved the B:C ratio (1.97) by reducing cost of cultivation and improving net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch reduced cultivation cost and improved net return.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
plastic mulche0
Outcome
cost of cultivation and improving net returne0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This higher growth leads to higher stover yield and plastic mulch prevents the weeding cost which finally improved the B:C ratio (1.97) by reducing cost of cultivation and improving net return.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors do not recommend minimum tillage without mulch under dryland conditions.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
minimum tillage without mulch is not recommended under dryland conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In conclusion, minimum tillage without mulch is not recommended under dryland condition but raise bed sowing with plastic mulch is a suitable practice among all practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend raised bed sowing with plastic mulch among the tested practices.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
raise bed sowing with plastic mulch is a suitable practice among all practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In conclusion, minimum tillage without mulch is not recommended under dryland condition but raise bed sowing with plastic mulch is a suitable practice among all practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds protected maize from excess water conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
raised bed practicee0
Outcome
prevent the maize crop from excess water conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch increased water use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch helped control weeds.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
controlling weede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastic mulch maintained temperature near the root zone.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
plastic mulchinge0
Outcome
temperature near root zonee0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of mulch degraded the fertile soil layer by erosion.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no mulch conditione0
Outcome
fertile layer of soile0
Direction
degradee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This shows that raised bed practice prevent the maize crop from excess water condition and plastic mulching is helpful in increasing water use efficiency, controlling weed and maintaining temperature near root zone but no mulch condition degrade the fertile layer of soil by erosion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1537 · show in text ↑

mulching · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 75 positive, 8 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

112 papers: 97 positive, 15 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

108 papers more in this group

See all 112 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 108 positive, 8 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.