Paper · 2015 · Egyptian Journal of Botany

Integration Effect Between Biofertilizers and Natural Fertilizers on Growth, Npk Uptake and Yield Parameters of Wheat Plant Grown in Alkaline Soil

L Shaaban; K Khalil; R El-Tantawy; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

TE AIM of this study was to assess the effectiveness of mixed Bacillus strains applications. These strains are B. megaterium var. phosphaticum which efficient in dissolving phosphate, B. circulansas potassium release bacteria and B. polymyxa as nitrogen fixer. The effect of the applied mixed bacillus strains, natural fertilizers and their interactions on the growth, nutrients uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, and yield parameters of wheat plants grown in a potted soil under natural conditions were studies. The results revealed that, the application of biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar) in alkaline soil caused a significant increase in growth and macronutrients (N, P and K) at vegetative stage which directly enhanced the yield parameters of wheat plants. Moreover, these dual fertilizers caused significant increase in ions (N, P and K) and crude protein contents of grains. It can be concluded that the combination between biofertilizers and natural fertilizers are one of the best modern tools and can replace the chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers with natural fertilizers significantly increased wheat growth and N, P and K at the vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee1
Treatment
biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar)e1
Interactor
Bacillus strainse1symbiont
Outcome
growth and macronutrients (N, P and K)e1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
potted soil under natural conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield parameters of wheat plants grown in a potted soil under natural conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–509 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar) in alkaline soil caused a significant increase in growth and macronutrients (N, P and K) at vegetative stage which directly enhanced the yield parameters of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–828 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual fertilizers significantly increased N, P and K ions and crude protein in wheat grain.

Organ / stage
grainse2
Treatment
dual fertilizerse2
Interactor
Bacillus strainse1symbiont
Outcome
ions (N, P and K) and crude protein contentse2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the application of biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar) in alkaline soil caused a significant increase in growth and macronutrients (N, P and K) at vegetative stage which directly enhanced the yield parameters of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–828 · show in text ↑
e2

“these dual fertilizers caused significant increase in ions (N, P and K) and crude protein contents of grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizers with natural fertilizers directly enhanced wheat yield parameters.

Treatment
biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar)e1
Interactor
Bacillus strainse1symbiont
Outcome
yield parameterse1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the application of biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar) in alkaline soil caused a significant increase in growth and macronutrients (N, P and K) at vegetative stage which directly enhanced the yield parameters of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–828 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combining biofertilizers with natural fertilizers can replace chemical fertilizers in wheat production.

Treatment
combination between biofertilizers and natural fertilizerse3
Outcome
replace the chemical fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the application of biofertilizers (Bacillus strains) with natural fertilizers (rock phosphate and feldspar) in alkaline soil caused a significant increase in growth and macronutrients (N, P and K) at vegetative stage which directly enhanced the yield parameters of wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–828 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combination between biofertilizers and natural fertilizers are one of the best modern tools and can replace the chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1111 · show in text ↑

feldspar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.