Paper · 1990 · Metal Powder Report

PM '90 Conference-London

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The levels of health-related phytochemicals were determined in lettuce leaf and in strawberry, raspberry and blueberry fruits grown in near-commercial conditions under plastic films of three different UV transparencies. In the red lettuce Lollo Rosso, total phenolics, anthocyanin, luteolin and quercetin levels were all raised by changing from a UV blocking film to a film of low UV transparency, and to a film of high UV transparency. The related green lettuce, Lollo Biondo, cultivated under the same conditions, showed virtually no phytochemical responses to the same variation in UV levels. Overall, the phenolic levels of strawberries, raspberries, and blueberries were unresponsive to the UV transparency of the plastic film under which the crops were grown. The significance of these findings is discussed in relation to the nutritional quality of soft fruit and salad crops which are increasingly being grown commercially under plastic tunnels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red lettuce Lollo Rosso had raised total phenolics, anthocyanin and luteolin under more UV transparent films.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Lollo Rossoe0
Treatment
a film of low UV transparencye0
Outcome
total phenolics, anthocyanin, luteoline0
Direction
raisede0
Comparator
a UV blocking filme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the red lettuce Lollo Rosso, total phenolics, anthocyanin, luteolin and quercetin levels were all raised by changing from a UV blocking film to a film of low UV transparency, and to a film of high UV transparency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red lettuce Lollo Rosso had raised quercetin under more UV transparent films.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Lollo Rossoe0
Treatment
a film of high UV transparencye0
Outcome
quercetin levelse0
Direction
raisede0
Comparator
a UV blocking filme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the red lettuce Lollo Rosso, total phenolics, anthocyanin, luteolin and quercetin levels were all raised by changing from a UV blocking film to a film of low UV transparency, and to a film of high UV transparency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green lettuce Lollo Biondo showed virtually no phytochemical response to UV variation.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Material
Lollo Biondoe0
Treatment
variation in UV levelse0
Outcome
phytochemical responsese0
Direction
virtually noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The related green lettuce, Lollo Biondo, cultivated under the same conditions, showed virtually no phytochemical responses to the same variation in UV levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strawberry phenolic levels were unresponsive to film UV transparency.

Taxon
strawberriesFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
UV transparency of the plastic filme0
Outcome
phenolic levelse0
Direction
unresponsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the phenolic levels of strawberries, raspberries, and blueberries were unresponsive to the UV transparency of the plastic film under which the crops were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raspberry phenolic levels were unresponsive to film UV transparency.

Taxon
raspberriese0
Treatment
UV transparency of the plastic filme0
Outcome
phenolic levelse0
Direction
unresponsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the phenolic levels of strawberries, raspberries, and blueberries were unresponsive to the UV transparency of the plastic film under which the crops were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blueberry phenolic levels were unresponsive to film UV transparency.

Taxon
blueberriese0
Treatment
UV transparency of the plastic filme0
Outcome
phenolic levelse0
Direction
unresponsivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the phenolic levels of strawberries, raspberries, and blueberries were unresponsive to the UV transparency of the plastic film under which the crops were grown”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–764 · show in text ↑

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · VacciniumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · VacciniumResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.