Paper · 2023 · Polish Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences

Effect of the Ultraviolet C Light-Emitting Diode Treatment on the Quality of Soil-Grown and Pot-Grown Red Raspberries

Nicole R. Giuggioli; Daniele M. Nucera; Serenella Piano; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) are often chosen by consumers for their flavour, taste, and health-promoting properties.A relevant issue related to these fruits is their high perishability.The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the ultraviolet C light-emitting diode (UVC-LED) treatment on soil-grown and pot-grown raspberries in extending their shelf--life, maintaining their high quality throughout the preservation period, and improving features related to their phenolic compound content.The UVC-LED treatment increased the total phenolic content (158 to 200 mg GAE/100 g) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (55.3 to 78.6 mmol Fe 2+ /kg) of the pot-grown raspberries when the UVC-LED treatment was followed by storage in a climate-controlled room (20C).Total anthocyanin content did not increase significantly compared to the control samples.Contrary to expectations, no effect of reducing the microbial count after storage was observed due to the exposure of raspberries to the UVC-LED radiation.The positive outcomes derived from the analyses of bioactive compounds may be implemented in further studies on the same matrix to better manage the treatment and its conditions, such as the exposure time, the distance from the LED lamps, and the UVC-rays' dose, in order to find the best combination in terms of efficacy and efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVC-LED treatment increased total phenolic content of pot-grown raspberries from 158 to 200 mg GAE/100 g after storage at 20C.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Material
pot-grown raspberriese0
Treatment
UVC-LED treatmente0
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
158 to 200 mg GAE/100 ge0
Setting
climate-controlled room (20C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UVC-LED treatment increased the total phenolic content (158 to 200 mg GAE/100 g) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (55.3 to 78.6 mmol Fe 2+ /kg) of the pot-grown raspberries when the UVC-LED treatment was followed by storage in a climate-controlled room (20C).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVC-LED treatment increased ferric reducing antioxidant power of pot-grown raspberries from 55.3 to 78.6 mmol Fe 2+ /kg after storage at 20C.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Material
pot-grown raspberriese0
Treatment
UVC-LED treatmente0
Outcome
ferric reducing antioxidant powere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55.3 to 78.6 mmol Fe 2+ /kge0
Setting
climate-controlled room (20C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The UVC-LED treatment increased the total phenolic content (158 to 200 mg GAE/100 g) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (55.3 to 78.6 mmol Fe 2+ /kg) of the pot-grown raspberries when the UVC-LED treatment was followed by storage in a climate-controlled room (20C).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total anthocyanin content did not increase significantly relative to controls.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
Ultraviolet C Light-Emitting Diode Treatmentt1
Outcome
Total anthocyanin contente0
Direction
did not increasee0
Comparator
control samplese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total anthocyanin content did not increase significantly compared to the control samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“Ultraviolet C Light-Emitting Diode Treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UVC-LED exposure did not reduce microbial count after raspberry storage.

Taxon
Red RaspberriesRubus idaeust0
Treatment
exposure of raspberries to the UVC-LED radiatione0
Outcome
microbial count after storagee0
Direction
no effect of reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no effect of reducing the microbial count after storage was observed due to the exposure of raspberries to the UVC-LED radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Red Raspberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–117 · show in text ↑

radiation · soil: biology · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.