Paper · 2007 · European Journal of Horticultural Science

Yield quality in some taxa of the genus Rubus depending on the cultivation technology

E. Vool; K. Karp; U. Moor; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary The purpose of this research project was to determine how mulching, specific harvesting times, and the differing weather conditions of the years involved affected the biochemical content of two Rubus family species: the raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.) 'Tomo' and the blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus coll.) 'Agawam'. The appropriate data were recorded in the course of the years 2001-2004. The 'Tomo' and 'Agawam' fruit weight was not significantly influenced by cultivation technology, but was influenced by harvesting time and the weather conditions of the particular year involved. The fruit dry matter (DM) was directly related to the berries' harvesting time. The soluble solids content (SSC) in the raspberry fruits was 9.9-13.3% and 8.9-16.0% in the blackberries. The raspberry fruits' SSC was significantly influenced by cultivation technology: the SSC was higher in berries grown without mulch. The ascorbic acid content (AAC) varied over the years, and depended mostly on the particular species. The raspberry fruits' AAC was significantly influenced by cultivation technology: the AAC was higher in berries grown without mulch. The blackberry fruits' AAC was also influenced by the harvesting time, being higher in berries from the last harvesting. The differing yearly wheather conditions had a greater effect on the blackberry fruits' titratable acids (TA) content. The results indicated that fruit weight and biochemical content were primarily influenced by the differing weather conditions of the various years involved. The berries, for instance, contained more DM and soluble solids, and less TA in 2002. Cultivation technology had significant influence only on the raspberry fruits' AAC and SSC. Harvesting time had an impact on both the raspberry and the blackberry fruit weight and DM content, but the fruit SSC, AAC, and TA were affected only in the blackberry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation technology did not significantly influence fruit weight in Tomo and Agawam.

Taxon
RubusRubust0
Material
'Tomo' and 'Agawam'e0
Treatment
cultivation technologye0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 'Tomo' and 'Agawam' fruit weight was not significantly influenced by cultivation technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rubus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting time and yearly weather influenced fruit weight in Tomo and Agawam.

Taxon
RubusRubust0
Material
'Tomo' and 'Agawam'e1
Treatment
harvesting timee0
Outcome
fruit weighte1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was influenced by harvesting time and the weather conditions of the particular year involved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–585 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 'Tomo' and 'Agawam' fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rubus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit dry matter was directly related to harvest time.

Taxon
RubusRubust0
Treatment
berries' harvesting timee0
Outcome
fruit dry matter (DM)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fruit dry matter (DM) was directly related to the berries' harvesting time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–665 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rubus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raspberry fruit soluble solids content ranged from 9.9 to 13.3%.

Taxon
Rubus idaeus L.Rubus idaeuse1
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC)e0
Value
9.9-13.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soluble solids content (SSC) in the raspberry fruits was 9.9-13.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“the raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackberry fruit soluble solids content ranged from 8.9 to 16.0%.

Taxon
Rubus fruticosus coll.Rubus fruticosuse1
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC)e2
Value
8.9-16.0%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus fruticosus
Rubus fruticosus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“8.9-16.0% in the blackberries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–771 · show in text ↑
e1

“the blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus coll.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–308 · show in text ↑
e2

“The soluble solids content (SSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raspberry soluble solids content was significantly higher without mulch.

Taxon
Rubus idaeus L.Rubus idaeuse1
Treatment
without mulche0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The raspberry fruits' SSC was significantly influenced by cultivation technology: the SSC was higher in berries grown without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“the raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raspberry ascorbic acid content was significantly higher without mulch.

Taxon
Rubus idaeus L.Rubus idaeuse2
Treatment
without mulche0
Outcome
AACe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus idaeus
Rubus idaeus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The raspberry fruits' AAC was significantly influenced by cultivation technology: the AAC was higher in berries grown without mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1139 · show in text ↑
e1

“ascorbic acid content (AAC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–937 · show in text ↑
e2

“the raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackberry ascorbic acid content was higher at the last harvest.

Taxon
Rubus fruticosus coll.Rubus fruticosuse1
Treatment
last harvestinge0
Outcome
AACe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus fruticosus
Rubus fruticosus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The blackberry fruits' AAC was also influenced by the harvesting time, being higher in berries from the last harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1260 · show in text ↑
e1

“the blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus coll.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–308 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackberry titratable acids content was more affected by yearly weather conditions.

Taxon
Rubus fruticosus coll.Rubus fruticosuse1
Treatment
differing yearly wheather conditionse0
Outcome
titratable acids (TA) contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus fruticosus
Rubus fruticosus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differing yearly wheather conditions had a greater effect on the blackberry fruits' titratable acids (TA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1379 · show in text ↑
e1

“the blackberry ( Rubus fruticosus coll.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berries contained more dry matter and soluble solids in 2002.

Taxon
RubusRubust0
Outcome
DM and soluble solidse0
Direction
moree0
Setting
2002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The berries, for instance, contained more DM and soluble solids, and less TA in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rubus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berries contained less titratable acids in 2002.

Taxon
RubusRubust0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
lesse0
Setting
2002e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rubus
Rubus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)George Chernilevsky · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The berries, for instance, contained more DM and soluble solids, and less TA in 2002”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rubus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

mulching · quality: phytochemicals · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mulching · molecular: metabolites · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.