Paper · 2018 · Journal of Agricultural Food and Environmental Sciences

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF VENTURIA INAEQUALIS – THE CAUSE OF APPLE SCAB IN APPLE

Rade Rusevski; Biljana Kuzmanovska; Eftim Petkovski; et al.

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The main goal of the experiment was to study the possibility for biological control of apple scab by use of innovative biofungicide Vacciplant (a.m. Laminarin) and to compare the results of biological control with those from standard chemical control of this disease. Experiment was conducted during the 2016 in region of Prespa and region of Tetovo, on two apple varieties, idared and golden delicious. In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, was observed very high level of infection (77.21% on the leaves and 24.35% on the fruits), which demonstrated the destructive potential of this apple disease in our country. In region of Prespa, significantly lower level of infection was observed in untreated variant (30% on the leaves and 9.5% on the fruits). Regarding the efficacy of tested fungicides, in region of Tetovo, standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan) used in chemical variant provided considerably lower degree of efficacy on leaves and fruits (71.38% and 60.86% respectively), compared with biofungicide used in biological variant (95.13% and 94.78% respectively). In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicides on the leaves and fruits (98.33% and 100% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of biofungicide (99.16% and 100%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated apple leaves in Tetovo had 77.21% infection.

Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
77.21%e0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, was observed very high level of infection (77.21% on the leaves and 24.35% on the fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated apple fruits in Tetovo had 24.35% infection.

Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Value
24.35%e0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In untreated variant in region of Tetovo, was observed very high level of infection (77.21% on the leaves and 24.35% on the fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–535 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated apple leaves in Prespa had 30% infection, significantly lower than in Tetovo.

Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
30%e0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, significantly lower level of infection was observed in untreated variant (30% on the leaves and 9.5% on the fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–756 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated apple fruits in Prespa had 9.5% infection, significantly lower than in Tetovo.

Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
infectione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
9.5%e0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, significantly lower level of infection was observed in untreated variant (30% on the leaves and 9.5% on the fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merpan leaf efficacy in Tetovo was 71.38%, lower than biofungicide efficacy.

Treatment
standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan)e0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy on leavese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
71.38%e0
Comparator
biofungicidee0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“in region of Tetovo, standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan) used in chemical variant provided considerably lower degree of efficacy on leaves and fruits (71.38% and 60.86% respectively), compared with biofungicide used in biological variant (95.13% and 94.78% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Merpan fruit efficacy in Tetovo was 60.86%, lower than biofungicide efficacy.

Treatment
standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan)e0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
fruitse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
60.86%e0
Comparator
biofungicidee0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“in region of Tetovo, standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan) used in chemical variant provided considerably lower degree of efficacy on leaves and fruits (71.38% and 60.86% respectively), compared with biofungicide used in biological variant (95.13% and 94.78% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofungicide leaf efficacy in Tetovo was 95.13%, exceeding Merpan.

Treatment
biofungicidee0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy on leavese0
Value
95.13%e0
Comparator
standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan)e0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“in region of Tetovo, standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan) used in chemical variant provided considerably lower degree of efficacy on leaves and fruits (71.38% and 60.86% respectively), compared with biofungicide used in biological variant (95.13% and 94.78% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofungicide fruit efficacy in Tetovo was 94.78%, exceeding Merpan.

Treatment
biofungicidee0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
fruitse0
Value
94.78%e0
Comparator
standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan)e0
Setting
region of Tetovoe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“in region of Tetovo, standard fungicide Merpan (a.m. captan) used in chemical variant provided considerably lower degree of efficacy on leaves and fruits (71.38% and 60.86% respectively), compared with biofungicide used in biological variant (95.13% and 94.78% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard fungicide leaf efficacy in Prespa was 98.33%, almost equal to biofungicide.

Treatment
standard fungicidese0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy performancee0
Direction
almost equale0
Value
98.33%e0
Comparator
biofungicidee0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicides on the leaves and fruits (98.33% and 100% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of biofungicide (99.16% and 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Standard fungicide fruit efficacy in Prespa was 100%, almost equal to biofungicide.

Treatment
standard fungicidese0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
efficacy performancee0
Direction
almost equale0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
biofungicidee0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicides on the leaves and fruits (98.33% and 100% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of biofungicide (99.16% and 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofungicide leaf efficacy in Prespa was 99.16%, almost equal to standard fungicide.

Treatment
biofungicidee0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
performance of biofungicidee0
Direction
almost equale0
Value
99.16%e0
Comparator
standard fungicidese0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicides on the leaves and fruits (98.33% and 100% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of biofungicide (99.16% and 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1275 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofungicide fruit efficacy in Prespa was 100%, almost equal to standard fungicide.

Treatment
biofungicidee0
Interactor
VENTURIA INAEQUALISVenturia inaequalist1pathogen
Outcome
performance of biofungicidee0
Direction
almost equale0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
standard fungicidese0
Setting
region of Prespae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Venturia inaequalis
Venturia inaequalis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“APPLE SCAB IN APPLE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
t1

“VENTURIA INAEQUALIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“In region of Prespa, the efficacy performance of standard fungicides on the leaves and fruits (98.33% and 100% respectively) was almost equal with the performance of biofungicide (99.16% and 100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1275 · show in text ↑

captan · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fungicide · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

biocontrol · Venturia inaequalis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.