Paper · 1996 · Journal of Experimental Botany

Intraspecific variation in the response of rice (Oryza sativaL.) to increased CO2and temperature: growth and yield response of 17 cultivars

Lewis H. Ziska; Paz A. Manalo; Raymond A. Ordonez

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
155
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Seventeen rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars of contrasting ecosystems and origins were exposed to two CO2 concentrations (373 [ambient] and 664 μl l−1 CO2 [elevated]) at two different day/night temperatures (29/21 °C and 37/29 °C) in glasshouses at the International Rice Research Institute phytotron during the dry seasons of 1994 and 1995. Growth at elevated CO2 (as determined by total plant biomass at maturity) increased by an average of 70% and 22%, respectively, for all cultivars for growth temperatures of 29/21 °C and 37/29 °C relative to the ambient CO2 treatment. At the 29/21 °C optimal growth temperature, grain yield increased on average c. 50% with enriched CO2. In contrast, at the higher growth temperature (37/29 °C), grain yield was almost zero, presumably due, in part, to temperature-induced infertility (i.e. the percentage of filled spikelets was <1%). Among cultivars, lAC 165, a tropical japonica from Brazil, showed the largest relative increase in both biomass and grain yield. While the range of responses to increased CO2 and/or temperature were quite large (e.g. 10–250%) and may not be applicable to field conditions, data indicate that lines are available which could maximize productivity as CO2 concentration increases. Additional work, however, would be needed to identify cultivars which would maintain maximum yields in a high CO2, high temperature environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased rice biomass by 70% at 29/21 °C.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
total plant biomass at maturitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
29/21 °Ce0
Comparator
ambient CO2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth at elevated CO2 (as determined by total plant biomass at maturity) increased by an average of 70% and 22%, respectively, for all cultivars for growth temperatures of 29/21 °C and 37/29 °C relative to the ambient CO2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased rice biomass by 22% at 37/29 °C.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
total plant biomass at maturitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
37/29 °Ce0
Comparator
ambient CO2 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth at elevated CO2 (as determined by total plant biomass at maturity) increased by an average of 70% and 22%, respectively, for all cultivars for growth temperatures of 29/21 °C and 37/29 °C relative to the ambient CO2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 29/21 °C elevated CO2 increased grain yield by about 50%.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Treatment
enriched CO2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
c. 50%e0
Qualifier
29/21 °Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 29/21 °C optimal growth temperature, grain yield increased on average c. 50% with enriched CO2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–677 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 37/29 °C rice grain yield was almost zero.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
almost zeroe0
Qualifier
37/29 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the higher growth temperature (37/29 °C), grain yield was almost zero”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–763 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 37/29 °C filled spikelets were below 1%.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Outcome
percentage of filled spikeletse0
Value
<1%e0
Qualifier
temperature-induced infertilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“temperature-induced infertility (i.e. the percentage of filled spikelets was <1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–874 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC 165 had the largest relative biomass increase among cultivars.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Material
lAC 165e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
largest relative increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lAC 165, a tropical japonica from Brazil, showed the largest relative increase in both biomass and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAC 165 had the largest relative grain yield increase among cultivars.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Material
lAC 165e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
largest relative increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lAC 165, a tropical japonica from Brazil, showed the largest relative increase in both biomass and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1004 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar responses to CO2 and temperature ranged from 10 to 250%.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Outcome
range of responses to increased CO2 and/or temperaturee0
Value
10–250%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the range of responses to increased CO2 and/or temperature were quite large (e.g. 10–250%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that available rice lines could maximize productivity with increasing CO2.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativae1
Outcome
maximize productivity as CO2 concentration increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lines are available which could maximize productivity as CO2 concentration increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–32 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 100 positive, 24 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.