Paper · 1990 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Growth and yield responses of rice to carbon dioxide concentration

J. T. Baker; L. H. Allen; K. J. Boote

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
199
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Rice plants ( Oryza saliva L., cv. IR30) were grown in paddy culture in outdoor, naturally sunlit, controlled-environment, plant growth chambers at Gainesville, Florida, USA, in 1987. The rice plants were exposed throughout the season to subambient (160 and 250), ambient (330) or superambient (500, 660, 900 μmol CO 2 /mol air) CO 2 concentrations. Total shoot biomass, root biomass, tillering, and final grain yield increased with increasing CO 2 concentration, thegreatest increase occurring between the 160 and 500 μmol CO 2 /mol air treatments. Early in the growing season, root:shoot biomass ratio increased with increasing CO 2 concentration; although the ratio decreased during the growing season, net assimilation rate increased with increasingCO 2 concentration and decreased during the growing season. Differences in biomass and lamina area among CO 2 treatments were largely due to corresponding differences in tillering response. The number of panicles/plant was almost entirely responsible for differences in final grain yield among CO 2 treatments. Doubling the CO2 concentration from 330 to 660 μmol CO 2 /mol air resulted in a 32 % increase in grain yield. These results suggest that important changes in the growth and yield of rice may be expected in the future as the CO 2 concentration of the earth's atmosphere continues to rise.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total shoot biomass, root biomass and tillering of rice increased with increasing CO2 concentration, most between the 160 and 500 μmol CO2/mol air treatments.

Treatment
CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
Total shoot biomass, root biomass, tilleringe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
greatest increase occurring between the 160 and 500 μmol CO 2 /mol air treatmentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total shoot biomass, root biomass, tillering, and final grain yield increased with increasing CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“thegreatest increase occurring between the 160 and 500 μmol CO 2 /mol air treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Final grain yield of rice increased with increasing CO2 concentration.

Treatment
CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
final grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Total shoot biomass, root biomass, tillering, and final grain yield increased with increasing CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 358–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early in the growing season the root:shoot biomass ratio of rice increased with increasing CO2 concentration.

Treatment
CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
root:shoot biomass ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Early in the growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Early in the growing season, root:shoot biomass ratio increased with increasing CO 2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–656 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root:shoot biomass ratio of rice decreased during the growing season.

Outcome
ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during the growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“although the ratio decreased during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate of rice increased with increasing CO2 concentration.

Treatment
CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“net assimilation rate increased with increasingCO 2 concentration and decreased during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–819 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate of rice decreased during the growing season.

Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during the growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“net assimilation rate increased with increasingCO 2 concentration and decreased during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–819 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in biomass and lamina area among CO2 treatments were largely due to corresponding differences in tillering response.

Treatment
CO 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
Differences in biomass and lamina areae0
Qualifier
corresponding differences in tillering responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Differences in biomass and lamina area among CO 2 treatments were largely due to corresponding differences in tillering response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–949 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of panicles per plant was almost entirely responsible for differences in final grain yield among CO2 treatments.

Treatment
CO 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
differences in final grain yielde0
Qualifier
number of panicles/plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“The number of panicles/plant was almost entirely responsible for differences in final grain yield among CO 2 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling the CO2 concentration from 330 to 660 μmol CO2/mol air increased rice grain yield by 32%.

Treatment
Doubling the CO2 concentration from 330 to 660 μmol CO 2 /mol aire0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
32 %e0
Comparator
330e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–34 · show in text ↑
e0

“Doubling the CO2 concentration from 330 to 660 μmol CO 2 /mol air resulted in a 32 % increase in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1180 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 100 positive, 24 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.