Paper · 2016 · Journal of Biological Control

Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions

Ashwini Narasimhan; Srividya Shivakumar

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The chilli crop suffers massive yield loss due to root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani. An increase of 10 × 105 root colonizing units/cm was obtained as a result of Bacillus subtilis in vitro root colonisation assay post germination. Shelf life studies of the formulations revealed stable population level of the biocontrol agent upto 180th day (30°C - 1.6 × 108; 4°C - 1.9 × 108) in talc and upto 150th day in lignite (30°C - 1.5 × 108; 4°C - 1.3 × 108). Soil, seed, foliar spray and dip treatment methods of B. subtilis and chlorothalonil brought about a considerable enhancement of all biometric parameters and reduced disease incidence compared to the untreated control. In comparison to the untreated control (50 g and 21 g fresh and dry weight, respectively), highest plant fresh weight (76.84 g) and dry weight (34.17 g) was achieved by the Seed application method. Comparison of plant height revealed maximum values 70 cm (soil application) and 77 cm (dip treatment) with B. subtilis application which was analogous to chlorothalonil treatment (56.5 cm with soil application and 70.33 cm with dip treatment) which was considerably superior to the untreated control (58.2 cm with dip treatment and 61 cm with soil application, respectively). Root dip treatment showed considerable increase in root length with B. subtilis (33 cm) and chlorothalonil (28.5 cm) when compared to untreated control (15 cm). Growth promotion was better with Root dip application while disease control was achieved better with seed application. A 66% and 84% reduction in incitation of disease was noticed with soil and seed application methods, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis increased root colonizing units after germination.

Taxon
Chillit0
Organ / stage
roote0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
root colonizing units/cme0
Direction
increasee0
Value
10 × 105 root colonizing units/cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase of 10 × 105 root colonizing units/cm was obtained as a result of Bacillus subtilis in vitro root colonisation assay post germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–234 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis formulation population remained stable in talc with value 1.6 × 108.

Taxon
Chillit0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
talce0
Value
1.6 × 108e0
Qualifier
upto 180th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upto 180th day (30°C - 1.6 × 108; 4°C - 1.9 × 108) in talc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis formulation population remained stable in talc with value 1.9 × 108.

Taxon
Chillit0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
talce0
Value
1.9 × 108e0
Qualifier
upto 180th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upto 180th day (30°C - 1.6 × 108; 4°C - 1.9 × 108) in talc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–389 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis formulation population remained stable in lignite with value 1.5 × 108.

Taxon
Chillit0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lignitee0
Value
1.5 × 108e0
Qualifier
upto 150th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upto 150th day in lignite (30°C - 1.5 × 108; 4°C - 1.3 × 108)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis formulation population remained stable in lignite with value 1.3 × 108.

Taxon
Chillit0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
lignitee0
Value
1.3 × 108e0
Qualifier
upto 150th daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“upto 150th day in lignite (30°C - 1.5 × 108; 4°C - 1.3 × 108)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis and chlorothalonil treatments enhanced biometric parameters relative to untreated control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilis and chlorothalonile0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
all biometric parameterse0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil, seed, foliar spray and dip treatment methods of B. subtilis and chlorothalonil brought about a considerable enhancement of all biometric parameters and reduced disease incidence compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments reduced disease incidence relative to untreated control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilis and chlorothalonile0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil, seed, foliar spray and dip treatment methods of B. subtilis and chlorothalonil brought about a considerable enhancement of all biometric parameters and reduced disease incidence compared to the untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application gave the highest plant fresh weight of 76.84 g.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
Seed application methode0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant fresh weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
76.84 ge0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to the untreated control (50 g and 21 g fresh and dry weight, respectively), highest plant fresh weight (76.84 g) and dry weight (34.17 g) was achieved by the Seed application method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application gave the highest dry weight of 34.17 g.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
Seed application methode0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilist0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.17 ge0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In comparison to the untreated control (50 g and 21 g fresh and dry weight, respectively), highest plant fresh weight (76.84 g) and dry weight (34.17 g) was achieved by the Seed application method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis soil application yielded plant height of 70 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
soil applicatione0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
70 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of plant height revealed maximum values 70 cm (soil application) and 77 cm (dip treatment) with B. subtilis application which was analogous to chlorothalonil treatment (56.5 cm with soil application and 70.33 cm with dip treatment) which was considerably superior to the untreated control (58.2 cm with dip treatment and 61 cm with soil application, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis dip treatment yielded plant height of 77 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
dip treatmente0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
77 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of plant height revealed maximum values 70 cm (soil application) and 77 cm (dip treatment) with B. subtilis application which was analogous to chlorothalonil treatment (56.5 cm with soil application and 70.33 cm with dip treatment) which was considerably superior to the untreated control (58.2 cm with dip treatment and 61 cm with soil application, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil soil application yielded plant height of 56.5 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
chlorothalonil treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
56.5 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of plant height revealed maximum values 70 cm (soil application) and 77 cm (dip treatment) with B. subtilis application which was analogous to chlorothalonil treatment (56.5 cm with soil application and 70.33 cm with dip treatment) which was considerably superior to the untreated control (58.2 cm with dip treatment and 61 cm with soil application, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorothalonil dip treatment yielded plant height of 70.33 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
chlorothalonil treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
70.33 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Comparison of plant height revealed maximum values 70 cm (soil application) and 77 cm (dip treatment) with B. subtilis application which was analogous to chlorothalonil treatment (56.5 cm with soil application and 70.33 cm with dip treatment) which was considerably superior to the untreated control (58.2 cm with dip treatment and 61 cm with soil application, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1249 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis root dip increased root length to 33 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilise0
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agentt0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root dip treatment showed considerable increase in root length with B. subtilis (33 cm) and chlorothalonil (28.5 cm) when compared to untreated control (15 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorothalonil root dip increased root length to 28.5 cm.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
chlorothalonile0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
28.5 cme0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Root dip treatment showed considerable increase in root length with B. subtilis (33 cm) and chlorothalonil (28.5 cm) when compared to untreated control (15 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dip application provided better growth promotion.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
Root dip applicatione0
Outcome
Growth promotione0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promotion was better with Root dip application while disease control was achieved better with seed application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed application provided better disease control.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seed applicatione0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Growth promotion was better with Root dip application while disease control was achieved better with seed application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1529 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

soil application reduced disease incitation by 66%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
soile0
Outcome
incitation of diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A 66% and 84% reduction in incitation of disease was noticed with soil and seed application methods, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

seed application reduced disease incitation by 84%.

Taxon
Chillit0
Treatment
seede0
Outcome
incitation of diseasee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
84%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A 66% and 84% reduction in incitation of disease was noticed with soil and seed application methods, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1530–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani Root Rot of Chilli by Bacillus subtilis formulations under Pot Conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.