Paper · 2024 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Enhancing the performance of chilli (Capsicum annuum) through twin role of plant growth promotion and disease suppressionvia Bacillus subtilis-based bioformulation

POPY BORA; BISHAL SAIKIA; MEHJEBIN RAHMAN; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Considering the majority of studies confined in vitro evaluation of microbial bioagents against diseases, a study was carried out during 2018–21 at Assam Agricultural University, Jorhat, Assam, (in vivo and field studies) to assess bio-efficacy of B. subtilis (strain LB22)-based liquid bioformulation against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) diseases of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). In vivo efficacy of B. subtilis formulation (inclusive treatment involving seed treatment, seedling dip, soil treatment and foliar spray) showed significant suppressiveness against both the diseases coupled with enhanced growth and yield attributes. Subsequently, the field evaluation of Bacillus subtilis formulation comparing standard chemicals also edged over the latter by 15.45% in terms of yield gains in 2-years of study. A significant reduction was found in disease severity during field evaluation of Bacillus subtilis formulation on account of induced resistance via upregulated synthesis of plant defense-enzymes (Polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and β-1,3-glucanase) by 2.3–11.0 folds with their peaks mostly expressed within 24–72 h. These results put forward a conceptual framework for delivery mechanism of a microbial bioagent in a formulation mode, having the potential to be effective against a number of other diseases as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulation significantly suppressed bacterial wilt in chilli.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilis formulatione0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bacterial wilte1
Direction
suppressivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo efficacy of B. subtilis formulation (inclusive treatment involving seed treatment, seedling dip, soil treatment and foliar spray) showed significant suppressiveness against both the diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–638 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulation significantly suppressed anthracnose in chilli.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilis formulatione0
Interactor
Colletotrichum gloeosporioidesColletotrichum gloeosporioidese1pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
anthracnosee1
Direction
suppressivenesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colletotrichum gloeosporioides
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides · InteractorRGimilio · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vivo efficacy of B. subtilis formulation (inclusive treatment involving seed treatment, seedling dip, soil treatment and foliar spray) showed significant suppressiveness against both the diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–638 · show in text ↑
e1

“bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) and anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulation enhanced growth and yield attributes.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
B. subtilis formulatione1
Interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth and yield attributese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coupled with enhanced growth and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“In vivo efficacy of B. subtilis formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulation gave 15.45% greater yield than standard chemicals over two years.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis formulatione0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yield gainse0
Direction
edged overe0
Value
15.45%e0
Comparator
standard chemicalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field evaluation of Bacillus subtilis formulation comparing standard chemicals also edged over the latter by 15.45% in terms of yield gains in 2-years of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The formulation significantly reduced disease severity in field evaluation.

Taxon
chillit0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis formulatione0
Interactor
Bacillus subtilisBacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction was found in disease severity during field evaluation of Bacillus subtilis formulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defense enzymes were upregulated by 2.3–11.0 folds, mostly peaking in 24–72 h.

Taxon
chillit0
Gene
Polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and β-1,3-glucanasee0
Outcome
synthesis of plant defense-enzymese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
2.3–11.0 foldse0
Qualifier
within 24–72 he0

Verbatim

e0

“upregulated synthesis of plant defense-enzymes (Polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, and β-1,3-glucanase) by 2.3–11.0 folds with their peaks mostly expressed within 24–72 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1213 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–35 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.