Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Botany

Impact of Funneliformis mosseae Inoculation on the Growth and Productivity of Gladiolus grandiflorus L. under Different Types and Rates of Organic Manures Fertilization

Mohamed A.I. Mansour; Hany M.S. Hassan; Mohamed A.I. AbdelKader

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

GLADIOLUS grandiflorus L. cv. White Prosperity corms were cultivated on field experiments during the two consecutive seasons of 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 at the Experimental Farm, Faculty of Environmental Agricultural Sciences, Arish University, Egypt to study the influence of Funneliformis mosseae (with and without inoculation) under different organic manures types: Chicken manure (ChM) and Farmyard manure (FYM) and rates (0.0, 10 and 20m3/feddan) on G. grandiflorus L. cv. White Prosperity on the vegetative growth and productivity. The obtained results showed that chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1 significantly increased gladiolus vegetative growth, flowering characters and reduced days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening during the two seasons. This treatment enhanced corm values and productivity with improvement of chemical constituent values during the two seasons. F. mosseae inoculation significantly increased all vegetative growth, flowering characters (except that of days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening), corms productivity and chemical constituents during both seasons. The interaction between F. mosseae and ChM or FYM significantly increased the formation and percentage of F. mosseae spore density, root colonization and structure (hyphae, vesicles and arbuscules) compared with control treatment. F. mosseae structures significantly increased by adding ChM at two rates (10 or 20m3 fed-1) which gave the highest values at flowering stage compared with after 30 days and harvesting stage in the two seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 20m3 fed -1 increased gladiolus vegetative growth and flowering characters.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1e0
Outcome
vegetative growth, flowering characterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1 significantly increased gladiolus vegetative growth, flowering characters and reduced days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening during the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 20m3 fed -1 reduced time to spike emergence and first floret opening.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse0
Treatment
chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1e0
Outcome
days to spike emergence and days to first floret openinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1 significantly increased gladiolus vegetative growth, flowering characters and reduced days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening during the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 20m3 fed -1 enhanced corm values and productivity.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse1
Treatment
chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1e1
Outcome
corm values and productivitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment enhanced corm values and productivity with improvement of chemical constituent values during the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1 significantly increased gladiolus vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 20m3 fed -1 improved chemical constituent values.

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse1
Treatment
chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1e1
Outcome
chemical constituent valuese0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment enhanced corm values and productivity with improvement of chemical constituent values during the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–900 · show in text ↑
e1

“chicken manure addition at 20m3 fed -1 significantly increased gladiolus vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation increased vegetative growth and flowering characters other than time to spike emergence and first floret opening.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculatione0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
vegetative growth, flowering characterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae inoculation significantly increased all vegetative growth, flowering characters (except that of days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening), corms productivity and chemical constituents during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation increased corm productivity.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculatione0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
corms productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae inoculation significantly increased all vegetative growth, flowering characters (except that of days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening), corms productivity and chemical constituents during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae inoculation increased chemical constituents.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
F. mosseae inoculatione0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
chemical constituentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae inoculation significantly increased all vegetative growth, flowering characters (except that of days to spike emergence and days to first floret opening), corms productivity and chemical constituents during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

F. mosseae and manure interaction increased spore density, root colonization and fungal structures versus control.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Treatment
F. mosseae and ChM or FYMe0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
F. mosseae spore density, root colonization and structuree0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction between F. mosseae and ChM or FYM significantly increased the formation and percentage of F. mosseae spore density, root colonization and structure (hyphae, vesicles and arbuscules) compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at both rates increased F. mosseae structures, peaking at flowering relative to 30 days and harvest.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorus L.Gladiolus grandiflorust0
Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
ChM at two rates (10 or 20m3 fed-1)e0
Interactor
F. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
F. mosseae structurese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
after 30 days and harvesting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F. mosseae structures significantly increased by adding ChM at two rates (10 or 20m3 fed-1) which gave the highest values at flowering stage compared with after 30 days and harvesting stage in the two seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gladiolus grandiflorus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–103 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gladiolus grandiflorusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.