Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Efficacy of bio-and chemical fertilizerrs on certain floral qualities of gladiolus.

R. K. Dubey; R. L. Misra; Shilpy Singh; et al.

19
claims
34
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment on two gladiolus varieties viz. Jester and Sylvia with chemical and bio-fertilizers was conducted in Division of Floriculture and Landscaping, IARI, Pusa, New Delhi. Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days). Application of full dose of NPK resulted into significant influence on delayed flowering floret diameter, florets remaining open, enhanced vase life and low disease incidence, While significant effect for days to last floret opening was recorded when there was no application of NPK. However, the effect of half dose of recommended NPK was found at par with that of full dose for days to flowering floret diameter and days to last floret opening. The combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days) among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments. Among interactive effects of varieties and chemical fertilizers, V1C2 was found best for low disease incidence (8.80%). Significant interactive effect between varieties and biofertilizers was recorded, as V1T2 showed low disease incidence (7.03%). Interactive effect of chemical and biofertilizers was also observed significant and C2T7 was found best for disease incidence (9.99%). However, interactive effect of varieties, chemical and biofertilizers was found significant for disease incidence (6.66%) under V1C2T7.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester flowered significantly earlier than Sylvia (116.16 days)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Value
116.16 dayse0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester had a higher floret diameter than Sylvia (8.37 cm)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
floret diametere0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.37 cme0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester had more florets per spike than Sylvia (13.60)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
florets/spikee0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Value
13.60e0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester kept more florets open (5.86) than Sylvia

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
floret remaining opene0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Value
5.86e0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester had 128.05 days to last floret opening, significantly better than Sylvia

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
days to last floret openinge0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Value
128.05 dayse0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester had enhanced vase life (8.34 days)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
vase lifee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.34 dayse0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Jester had low disease incidence (9.07%)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Jestere0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
lowe0
Value
9.07%e0
Comparator
Sylviae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sylvia had more days to last floret opening (135.04 days) than Jester

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
Sylviae0
Outcome
days to last floret openinge0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Value
135.04 dayse0
Comparator
Jestere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Variety Jester performed significantly better over Sylvia for early flowering (116.16 days) higher floret diameter (8.37 cm), florets/spike (13.60), floret remaining open (5.86), days to last floret opening (128.05 days), enhanced vase life (8.34 days) and low disease incidence (9.07%) while variety Sylvia was found significantly better for more number of days to last floret opening (135.04 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full dose of NPK significantly influenced flowering delay, floret diameter and florets remaining open

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
full dose of NPKe2
Outcome
delayed flowering floret diameter, florets remaining opene2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of full dose of NPK resulted into significant influence on delayed flowering floret diameter, florets remaining open, enhanced vase life and low disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full dose of NPK significantly influenced enhanced vase life and low disease incidence

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
full dose of NPKe2
Outcome
enhanced vase life and low disease incidencee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“Application of full dose of NPK resulted into significant influence on delayed flowering floret diameter, florets remaining open, enhanced vase life and low disease incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half dose of recommended NPK was at par with full dose for days to flowering, floret diameter and days to last floret opening

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
half dose of recommended NPKe3
Outcome
days to flowering floret diameter and days to last floret openinge3
Direction
at pare3
Comparator
full dosee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the effect of half dose of recommended NPK was found at par with that of full dose for days to flowering floret diameter and days to last floret opening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1026 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB gave the best days to flowering (114.59 days)

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse4
Treatment
combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSBe4
Interactor
AZT+PSBe4symbiont
Outcome
days to floweringe4
Direction
beste4
Value
114.59 dayse4
Comparator
all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days) among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB gave the best first floret diameter (9.08 cm)

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse4
Treatment
combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSBe4
Interactor
AZT+PSBe4symbiont
Outcome
first floret diametere4
Direction
beste4
Value
9.08 cme4
Comparator
all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days) among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB gave the best florets remaining open (6.46)

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse4
Treatment
combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSBe4
Interactor
AZT+PSBe4symbiont
Outcome
florets remaining opene4
Direction
beste4
Value
6.46e4
Comparator
all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days) among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB gave the best days to last floret opening (128.90 days)

Taxon
gladiolusGladioluse4
Treatment
combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSBe4
Interactor
AZT+PSBe4symbiont
Outcome
days to last floret openinge4
Direction
beste4
Value
128.90 dayse4
Comparator
all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The combined inoculation of gladiolus corms with AZT+PSB was found best for days to flowering (114.59 days), first floret diameter (9.08 cm), florets remaining open (6.46) and days to last floret opening (128.90 days) among all the bio-fertilizer(s) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety V1C2 had the lowest disease incidence (8.80%) among chemical fertilizer interactions

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
V1C2e5
Treatment
chemical fertilizerse5
Outcome
low disease incidencee5
Direction
beste5
Value
8.80%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Among interactive effects of varieties and chemical fertilizers, V1C2 was found best for low disease incidence (8.80%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1408 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety V1T2 showed low disease incidence (7.03%) in the variety by biofertilizer interaction

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
V1T2e6
Treatment
biofertilizerse6
Outcome
low disease incidencee6
Direction
lowe6
Value
7.03%e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Significant interactive effect between varieties and biofertilizers was recorded, as V1T2 showed low disease incidence (7.03%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C2T7 had the lowest disease incidence (9.99%) in the chemical and biofertilizer interaction

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
C2T7e7
Treatment
chemical and biofertilizerse7
Outcome
disease incidencee7
Direction
beste7
Value
9.99%e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“Interactive effect of chemical and biofertilizers was also observed significant and C2T7 was found best for disease incidence (9.99%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1671 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interaction of variety, chemical and biofertilizers under V1C2T7 significantly affected disease incidence (6.66%)

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
V1C2T7e7
Treatment
chemical and biofertilizerse7
Outcome
disease incidencee7
Value
6.66%e7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“However, interactive effect of varieties, chemical and biofertilizers was found significant for disease incidence (6.66%) under V1C2T7”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1673–1807 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · disease · GladiolusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · phenology · GladiolusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.