Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Phytoremediation

Growth tolerance, concentration, and uptake of heavy metals as ameliorated by silicon application in vegetables

Moses M. Ngugi; Harun I. Gitari; Catherine W. Muui; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
37
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) are among the heavy metals with phytotoxic and toxic effects on vegetables resulting in a significant decrease in crop yields. On the contrary, silicon (Si) has beneficial effects in enhancing plants’ tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses such as that imposed by heavy metals. This study evaluated the effects of Pb and Cd on the growth, biomass, and ameliorative mechanism of Si on concentration and uptake by leafy vegetables: spinach, kale, and amaranth. The greenhouse experiment treatments were Pb, Pb + Si, Cd, Cd + Si, Si, and control. These were arranged as a split-plot in a complete randomized design (CRD): main plots constituted vegetable species and treatments as subplots. The field experiment was carried in the Kenyatta University Research Farm, and treatments included Si application and control, arranged in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Cadmium application reduced root biomass by 53–70% while Pb reduced it by 54–61% when compared with control. Silicon fertilization enhanced biomass tolerance by three-folds’ and significantly (p < 0.001) reduced concentration and uptake of Pb and Cd. Results indicated a strong negative correlation between Cd concentrations and growth parameters (r = 0.8). The study recommends Si application to enhance leafy vegetables' tolerance to Pb and Cd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced root biomass by 53–70% relative to control.

Treatment
Cadmium applicatione0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
53–70%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium application reduced root biomass by 53–70% while Pb reduced it by 54–61% when compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead reduced root biomass by 54–61% relative to control.

Treatment
Pbe0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54–61%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium application reduced root biomass by 53–70% while Pb reduced it by 54–61% when compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilization enhanced biomass tolerance threefold.

Treatment
Silicon fertilizatione0
Outcome
biomass tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
three-folds’e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilization enhanced biomass tolerance by three-folds’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1072 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilization significantly reduced lead concentration and uptake.

Treatment
Silicon fertilizatione0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Pbe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
p < 0.001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilization enhanced biomass tolerance by three-folds’ and significantly (p < 0.001) reduced concentration and uptake of Pb and Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon fertilization significantly reduced cadmium concentration and uptake.

Treatment
Silicon fertilizatione0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Pb and Cde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
p < 0.001e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silicon fertilization enhanced biomass tolerance by three-folds’ and significantly (p < 0.001) reduced concentration and uptake of Pb and Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium concentration was negatively correlated with growth parameters, with reported r = 0.8.

Compound
Cde0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = 0.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus caudatus
Amaranthus caudatus · TaxonTubifex · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong negative correlation between Cd concentrations and growth parameters (r = 0.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach, kale, and amaranth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend silicon application to enhance heavy metal tolerance of leafy vegetables.

Taxon
leafy vegetablese0
Outcome
Si application to enhance leafy vegetables' tolerance to Pb and Cde0

Verbatim

e0

“The study recommends Si application to enhance leafy vegetables' tolerance to Pb and Cd”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1344 · show in text ↑

lead atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

lead atom · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

lead atom · growth · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Amaranthus caudatus (amaranth)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.