Paper · 2021 · Toxins

Transformation of Selected Fusarium Toxins and Their Masked Forms during Malting of Various Cultivars of Wheat

Edyta Ksieniewicz-Woźniak; Marcin Bryła; Dorota Michałowska; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of malting of six wheat cultivars inoculated with Fusarium culmorum on the dynamics of content changes of selected Fusarium toxins. The grains of all the tested cultivars showed a high content of deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and their derivatives, whereas nivalenol (NIV) and its glucoside were found only in the Legenda cultivar. Our experiments confirmed that the malting process of wheat grain enables the secondary growth of Fusarium, and mycotoxin biosynthesis. The levels of toxins in malt were few-fold higher than those in grain; an especially high increase was noted in the case of ZEN and its sulfate as the optimal temperature and pH conditions for the biosynthesis of these toxins by the pathogen are similar to those used in the grain malting process. This is the first paper reporting that during the malting process, biosynthesis of ZEN sulfate occurs, instead of glycosylation, which is a typical modification of mycotoxins by plant detoxication enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested wheat cultivars had high grain DON, ZEN, and derivative content.

Material
all the tested cultivarse0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Outcome
high content of deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and their derivativese0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grains of all the tested cultivars showed a high content of deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and their derivatives”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nivalenol and its glucoside occurred only in Legenda wheat.

Material
Legenda cultivare0
Outcome
nivalenol (NIV) and its glucoside were found onlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nivalenol (NIV) and its glucoside were found only in the Legenda cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain malting enabled secondary Fusarium growth.

Treatment
malting processe0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
secondary growth of Fusariume0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the malting process of wheat grain enables the secondary growth of Fusarium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain malting enabled mycotoxin biosynthesis.

Treatment
malting processe0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
mycotoxin biosynthesise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the malting process of wheat grain enables the secondary growth of Fusarium, and mycotoxin biosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxin levels were several times higher in malt than grain.

Treatment
malte0
Outcome
levels of toxinse0
Direction
highere0
Value
few-folde0
Comparator
graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The levels of toxins in malt were few-fold higher than those in grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEN increased especially strongly during malting.

Treatment
grain malting processe1
Outcome
ZENe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an especially high increase was noted in the case of ZEN and its sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the grain malting process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEN sulfate increased especially strongly during malting.

Treatment
grain malting processe1
Outcome
its sulfatee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an especially high increase was noted in the case of ZEN and its sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the grain malting process”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZEN sulfate biosynthesis occurred during malting instead of glycosylation.

Treatment
malting processe0
Outcome
biosynthesis of ZEN sulfate occurse0
Comparator
glycosylatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“during the malting process, biosynthesis of ZEN sulfate occurs, instead of glycosylation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–939 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–110 · show in text ↑

processing · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.