Paper · 2017 · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Effects of harvest time and added molasses on nutritional content, ensiling characteristics and in vitro degradation of whole crop wheat

Chuanqi Xia; Yixun Liang; Sarula Bai; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
30
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Objective: Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China. This study examined the effects of harvest time and added molasses on nutritional content, ensiling characteristics and in vitro degradation of whole crop wheat (WCW). Methods: Fresh WCW at the milk-ripe stage was harvested at 0700 h (i.e., in the morning [Mo]) and 1700 h (i.e., in the afternoon [Af]), and then immediately used to prepare silage and make hay. Commercial molasses was added to Af WCW at 0%, 2%, 4%, and 6% (fresh weight) proportions. The WCW treated with molasses was mixed thoroughly prior to ensiling. Results: Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (p<0.01), accumulative gas production in 72 h (GP 72h , 77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) and dry matter disappearance in vitro (69.15% vs 76.77%) were lower (p<0.05), while crude protein (CP) content was higher for WCW silage (WCWS) compared to WCW (p<0.01). The propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations in WCWS from Mo WCW were 1.47% and 0.26%, respectively. However, the propionic and butyric acid concentrations were negligible, while the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen (NH 3 -N/TN, p<0.01) concentration was lower and the rate of gas production at 50% of the maximum (17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/h, p<0.05) was higher for Af WCWS compared to Mo WCWS. The incubation fluid's NH 3 -N concentration was lower in WCWS and Af WCW compared to Mo WCW (p<0.05). The CP and WSC content increased with increasing molasses levels (p<0.05). Furthermore, the pH (p<0.01) and time when gas production was 50% of the maximum (2.78 h vs 3.05 h, p<0.05) were lower in silage treated with 4% molasses than silage without molasses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop wheat silage had lower dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and water soluble carbohydrate content than fresh whole crop wheat.

Treatment
WCW silage (WCWS)e1
Outcome
Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) contente1
Direction
lowere1
Comparator
WCWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (p<0.01), accumulative gas production in 72 h (GP 72h , 77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) and dry matter disappearance in vitro (69.15% vs 76.77%) were lower (p<0.05), while crude protein (CP) content was higher for WCW silage (WCWS) compared to WCW (p<0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop wheat silage had lower accumulative gas production in 72 h (77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) than fresh whole crop wheat.

Treatment
WCW silage (WCWS)e1
Outcome
accumulative gas production in 72 he1
Direction
lowere1
Value
77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/ge1
Comparator
WCWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (p<0.01), accumulative gas production in 72 h (GP 72h , 77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) and dry matter disappearance in vitro (69.15% vs 76.77%) were lower (p<0.05), while crude protein (CP) content was higher for WCW silage (WCWS) compared to WCW (p<0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop wheat silage had lower in vitro dry matter disappearance (69.15% vs 76.77%) than fresh whole crop wheat.

Treatment
WCW silage (WCWS)e1
Outcome
dry matter disappearance in vitroe1
Direction
lowere1
Value
69.15% vs 76.77%e1
Comparator
WCWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (p<0.01), accumulative gas production in 72 h (GP 72h , 77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) and dry matter disappearance in vitro (69.15% vs 76.77%) were lower (p<0.05), while crude protein (CP) content was higher for WCW silage (WCWS) compared to WCW (p<0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop wheat silage had higher crude protein content than fresh whole crop wheat.

Treatment
WCW silage (WCWS)e1
Outcome
crude protein (CP) contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
WCWe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content (p<0.01), accumulative gas production in 72 h (GP 72h , 77.46 mL/g vs 95.15 mL/g) and dry matter disappearance in vitro (69.15% vs 76.77%) were lower (p<0.05), while crude protein (CP) content was higher for WCW silage (WCWS) compared to WCW (p<0.01).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–955 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propionic acid concentration in silage from morning-harvested whole crop wheat was 1.47%.

Outcome
propionic acide2
Value
1.47%e2
Qualifier
WCWS from Mo WCWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“The propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations in WCWS from Mo WCW were 1.47% and 0.26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Butyric acid concentration in silage from morning-harvested whole crop wheat was 0.26%.

Outcome
butyric acide2
Value
0.26%e2
Qualifier
WCWS from Mo WCWe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e2

“The propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations in WCWS from Mo WCW were 1.47% and 0.26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propionic and butyric acid concentrations were negligible in the silage.

Outcome
propionic and butyric acid concentrationse3
Qualifier
negligiblee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the propionic and butyric acid concentrations were negligible, while the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen (NH 3 -N/TN, p<0.01) concentration was lower and the rate of gas production at 50% of the maximum (17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/h, p<0.05) was higher for Af WCWS compared to Mo WCWS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen was lower in afternoon-harvested silage than in morning-harvested silage.

Treatment
Af WCWSe3
Outcome
ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogene3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
Mo WCWSe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the propionic and butyric acid concentrations were negligible, while the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen (NH 3 -N/TN, p<0.01) concentration was lower and the rate of gas production at 50% of the maximum (17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/h, p<0.05) was higher for Af WCWS compared to Mo WCWS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate of gas production at 50% of the maximum was higher in afternoon-harvested silage (17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/h) than in morning-harvested silage.

Treatment
Af WCWSe3
Outcome
rate of gas production at 50% of the maximume3
Direction
highere3
Value
17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/he3
Comparator
Mo WCWSe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, the propionic and butyric acid concentrations were negligible, while the ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen (NH 3 -N/TN, p<0.01) concentration was lower and the rate of gas production at 50% of the maximum (17.05 mL/h vs 13.94 mL/h, p<0.05) was higher for Af WCWS compared to Mo WCWS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1352 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubation fluid NH3-N concentration was lower in silage and afternoon-harvested whole crop wheat than in morning-harvested whole crop wheat.

Treatment
WCWS and Af WCWe4
Outcome
NH 3 -N concentratione4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
Mo WCWe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“The incubation fluid's NH 3 -N concentration was lower in WCWS and Af WCW compared to Mo WCW (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1455 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein and water soluble carbohydrate content increased with increasing molasses levels in whole crop wheat silage.

Treatment
increasing molasses levelse5
Outcome
CP and WSC contente5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e5

“The CP and WSC content increased with increasing molasses levels (p<0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage treated with 4% molasses had lower pH than silage without molasses.

Treatment
4% molassese6
Outcome
pHe6
Direction
lowere6
Comparator
silage without molassese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e6

“the pH (p<0.01) and time when gas production was 50% of the maximum (2.78 h vs 3.05 h, p<0.05) were lower in silage treated with 4% molasses than silage without molasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Time when gas production reached 50% of the maximum was lower in silage treated with 4% molasses (2.78 h vs 3.05 h).

Treatment
4% molassese6
Outcome
time when gas production was 50% of the maximume6
Direction
lowere6
Value
2.78 h vs 3.05 he6
Comparator
silage without molassese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat is an alternative to corn silage for ruminant feeding in northern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–88 · show in text ↑
e6

“the pH (p<0.01) and time when gas production was 50% of the maximum (2.78 h vs 3.05 h, p<0.05) were lower in silage treated with 4% molasses than silage without molasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1714 · show in text ↑

molasses · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

processing · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 34 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.