Paper · 1979 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Free amino acids in germinated wheat

Russell Tkachuk

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
31
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Wheat was germinated at three different temperatures (10, 16.5 and 25°C) to examine the changes in free amino acid levels. The free amino acid content after 122 h of germination was respectively 4 x, 10x and 7x that of the sound wheat at ‘0 h ’Glutamine and proline showed the largest increases. Proline increased 100‐fold during 122 h of germination at 16.5°C.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10°C, free amino acids after 122 hours were four times those in sound wheat.

Treatment
germinatione0
Outcome
free amino acid contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
4 xe0
Qualifier
122 he0
Comparator
sound wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The free amino acid content after 122 h of germination was respectively 4 x, 10x and 7x that of the sound wheat at ‘0 h ’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 16.5°C, free amino acids after 122 hours were ten times those in sound wheat.

Treatment
germinatione0
Outcome
free amino acid contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
10xe0
Qualifier
122 he0
Comparator
sound wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The free amino acid content after 122 h of germination was respectively 4 x, 10x and 7x that of the sound wheat at ‘0 h ’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25°C, free amino acids after 122 hours were seven times those in sound wheat.

Treatment
germinatione0
Outcome
free amino acid contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
7xe0
Qualifier
122 he0
Comparator
sound wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The free amino acid content after 122 h of germination was respectively 4 x, 10x and 7x that of the sound wheat at ‘0 h ’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–253 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutamine and proline had the largest increases during germination.

Outcome
Glutamine and prolinee0
Direction
largest increasese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Glutamine and proline showed the largest increases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased 100-fold during 122 hours at 16.5°C.

Treatment
germination at 16.5°Ce0
Outcome
Prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
100‐folde0
Qualifier
122 he0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Proline increased 100‐fold during 122 h of germination at 16.5°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 305–370 · show in text ↑

processing · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.