Paper · 2010 · He'nan nongye kexue

Effect of different Fusarium graminearum on yield and its important components of wheat.

Yang JiZhi; Wang JiShi; Gong Guoshu; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat scab is one of the important diseases in China.It is important to carry out research on yield loss due to wheat scab.The flowering wheatears were inoculated with the different Fusarium graminearum bacterial strain at the blooming stage.The results showed that the rate of diseased grain had extremely notable negative relationship to 1000-grain weight(r=-0.8079**) and yield(r=-0.7857**),and notable positive relationship existed between 1000-grain weight and yield(r=0.9221**).Different Fusarium graminearum affected yield,rate of diseased grains and 1000-grain weight.The study indicated that 11# bacterial strain was the most influential factors to the rate of diseased grains among tested Fusarium graminearum,and the 1000-grain weight was significantly reduced by the artificial inoculation with 11# bacterial strain.There was most influential to the variety rate of the yield of variety,XI-KE number 2 was most affected by the bacteria,and the yield variation range was 10.87%-33.26%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased grain rate was negatively related to thousand-grain weight.

Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
negative relationshipe0
Value
r=-0.8079**e0
Comparator
rate of diseased graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of diseased grain had extremely notable negative relationship to 1000-grain weight(r=-0.8079**) and yield(r=-0.7857**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased grain rate was negatively related to yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negative relationshipe0
Value
r=-0.7857**e0
Comparator
rate of diseased graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of diseased grain had extremely notable negative relationship to 1000-grain weight(r=-0.8079**) and yield(r=-0.7857**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight was positively related to yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positive relationshipe0
Value
r=0.9221**e0
Comparator
1000-grain weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“notable positive relationship existed between 1000-grain weight and yield(r=0.9221**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different Fusarium graminearum strains affected wheat yield.

Treatment
Different Fusarium graminearume0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different Fusarium graminearum affected yield,rate of diseased grains and 1000-grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different Fusarium graminearum strains affected diseased-grain rate.

Treatment
Different Fusarium graminearume0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
rate of diseased grainse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different Fusarium graminearum affected yield,rate of diseased grains and 1000-grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different Fusarium graminearum strains affected thousand-grain weight.

Treatment
Different Fusarium graminearume0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different Fusarium graminearum affected yield,rate of diseased grains and 1000-grain weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 11# had the largest reported influence on diseased-grain rate among tested strains.

Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
rate of diseased grainse0
Qualifier
11# bacterial straine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11# bacterial strain was the most influential factors to the rate of diseased grains among tested Fusarium graminearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Artificial inoculation with strain 11# significantly reduced thousand-grain weight.

Treatment
artificial inoculation with 11# bacterial straine0
Interactor
11# bacterial straine0pathogen
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1000-grain weight was significantly reduced by the artificial inoculation with 11# bacterial strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

XI-KE number 2 was the most affected wheat variety.

Material
XI-KE number 2e0
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae0pathogen
Outcome
yield variation rangee0
Value
10.87%-33.26%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“XI-KE number 2 was most affected by the bacteria,and the yield variation range was 10.87%-33.26%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.