Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to find out the effect of different level of pruning on physico-chemical properties of mango cv. Amrapali. The size of fruit improved with the severity of pruning treatment. The largest fruit size (11.58 cm) was obtained in light pruned tree followed by severe (10.66 cm) and moderate (10.53 cm) pruning intensities. The maximum fruit weight was recorded in severely pruned branches but it was not significant to other pruning treatment in both years of investigation. The fruit pulp and stone weight were influenced by the pruning intensity and highest pulp weight (169.77 g) and stone weight (43.25 g) were recorded in moderate pruning and were found significant over the other treatment in both the year. The pulp and stone ratio was recorded maximum in severe pruned trees during first and second year in control, respectively. Pruning treatments slightly improved the fruit year (3.92) and in moderately pruned tree during second year (3.93) while minimum in first and second year in control, respectively. Pruning treatments slightly improved the fruit quality of cv. Amrapali with respect to T.S.S., acidity and T.S.S.: acid ratio. Total soluble solids were estimated to be the highest (18.51 B) in moderate pruning and control showed less T.S.S. (17.06°Brix), which was statistically lower than other pruning treatments. Maximum acidity, (0.32 and 0.31% during first year and second year, respectively) was estimated for control but it was not significant to other pruning treatment. The maximum T.S.S.: acid ratio (74.04) was observed for moderate pruning during the first year. In the second year, light pruned trees recorded the highest T.S.S. followed by severe pruning with non significant differences.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit size improved with the severity of the pruning treatment.
- Taxon
- mango cv. Amrapali
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- severity of pruning treatmente1
- Outcome
- size of fruite1
- Direction
- improvede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e1“The size of fruit improved with the severity of pruning treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The largest fruit size (11.58 cm) was obtained in light pruned trees, followed by severe (10.66 cm) and moderate (10.53 cm) pruning.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- light pruned treee2
- Outcome
- fruit sizee2
- Direction
- largeste2
- Value
- 11.58 cme2
- Qualifier
- followed by severe (10.66 cm) and moderate (10.53 cm)e2
- Comparator
- severee2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e2“The largest fruit size (11.58 cm) was obtained in light pruned tree followed by severe (10.66 cm) and moderate (10.53 cm) pruning intensities”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum fruit weight was recorded in severely pruned branches, not significantly different from other pruning treatments, in both years.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- severely pruned branchese3
- Outcome
- fruit weighte3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Qualifier
- in both years of investigatione3
- Comparator
- other pruning treatmente3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e3“The maximum fruit weight was recorded in severely pruned branches but it was not significant to other pruning treatment in both years of investigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Pulp weight was highest (169.77 g) in moderate pruning and was significant over the other treatments.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- moderate pruninge4
- Outcome
- pulp weighte4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 169.77 ge4
- Comparator
- other treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e4“highest pulp weight (169.77 g) and stone weight (43.25 g) were recorded in moderate pruning and were found significant over the other treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Stone weight was highest (43.25 g) in moderate pruning and was significant over the other treatments.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- moderate pruninge4
- Outcome
- stone weighte4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 43.25 ge4
- Comparator
- other treatmente4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e4“highest pulp weight (169.77 g) and stone weight (43.25 g) were recorded in moderate pruning and were found significant over the other treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The pulp and stone ratio was maximum in severely pruned trees against control, during the first and second year respectively.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- severe pruned treese5
- Outcome
- pulp and stone ratioe5
- Direction
- maximume5
- Qualifier
- during first and second year in control, respectivelye5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e5“The pulp and stone ratio was recorded maximum in severe pruned trees during first and second year in control, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning treatments slightly improved fruit quality (T.S.S., acidity and T.S.S.: acid ratio).
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- Pruning treatmentse6
- Outcome
- T.S.S., acidity and T.S.S.: acid ratioe6
- Direction
- improvede6
- Qualifier
- slightlye6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e6“Pruning treatments slightly improved the fruit quality of cv. Amrapali with respect to T.S.S., acidity and T.S.S.: acid ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Total soluble solids were highest (18.51 B) in moderate pruning.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- moderate pruninge7
- Outcome
- Total soluble solidse7
- Direction
- higheste7
- Value
- 18.51 Be7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e7“Total soluble solids were estimated to be the highest (18.51 B) in moderate pruning”
Claim · model-written summary
Control fruit had less total soluble solids (17.06 Brix) than the other pruning treatments.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- controle1
- Outcome
- T.S.S.e1
- Direction
- lesse1
- Value
- 17.06°Brixe1
- Comparator
- other pruning treatmentse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e1“control showed less T.S.S. (17.06°Brix), which was statistically lower than other pruning treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Maximum acidity was estimated for control, not significantly different from other pruning treatments (0.32 and 0.31% in the first and second year).
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- controle1
- Outcome
- aciditye1
- Direction
- Maximume1
- Value
- 0.32 and 0.31%e1
- Qualifier
- during first year and second year, respectivelye1
- Comparator
- other pruning treatmente1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e1“Maximum acidity, (0.32 and 0.31% during first year and second year, respectively) was estimated for control but it was not significant to other pruning treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum T.S.S.: acid ratio (74.04) was observed for moderate pruning during the first year.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- moderate pruninge1
- Outcome
- T.S.S.: acid ratioe1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 74.04e1
- Qualifier
- during the first yeare1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e1“The maximum T.S.S.: acid ratio (74.04) was observed for moderate pruning during the first year”
Claim · model-written summary
In the second year, light pruned trees had the highest T.S.S., followed by severe pruning, with non significant differences.
- Taxon
- mango cv. AmrapaliMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- light pruned treese1
- Outcome
- T.S.S.e1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Qualifier
- with non significant differencese1
- Comparator
- severe pruninge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mango cv. Amrapali”
e1“In the second year, light pruned trees recorded the highest T.S.S. followed by severe pruning with non significant differences”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →pruning · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →pruning · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →light · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.