Paper · 2023 · Reviews In Food And Agriculture

ECONOMICAL EVALUATION OF MANGO (CV. KEITT) TREES UNDER COLOURED SHADE NETS

Assem A. A. Mohamed; Mohamed A. A. Abdrabbo; Mahmoued A. Medany; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study explored the economical viability of five different coloured shade nets (White, yellow, red, blue and black) on mango production (Mangifera indica L. cv. Keitt). This study investigated the climatic parameters in terms of light intensity, minimum and maximum air temperature, relative humidity and plant growth across 2019 and 2020 seasons. When compared to open field conditions, coloured shade nets resulted in higher maximum temperatures and relative humidity. The black net cover and open field treatments gave the lowest mango yield compared to all greenhouse net cover. When compared to the other treatments, the use of white or yellow nets resulted in a considerable increase in the number of fruits and total yield per plant. According to prevailed conditions, it could be concluded that optimum microclimate for growing mango in similar conditions could be obtained under white and yellow nets compared to the other net covers. Black greenhouse net cover gave the lowest productivity during the experimental duration. Production costs, total revenue, net return and ratio of total revenue to cost for Keitt mango in Egypt are presented in this study. The result shows that the net return for white net reached 15777 Egyptian pound (LE) and LE 15270 per m2 in 2019 and 2020 respectively, which was 2.63 times those grown in the open field (LE 5980 and LE 5081 per 2000 m2) in 2019 and 2020 respectively. However, Revenue to cost ratio was found higher in white net in both seasons which were 1.9 and 1.8 respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade nets raised maximum temperature and relative humidity over open field.

Treatment
coloured shade netse0
Outcome
maximum temperatures and relative humiditye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
open field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to open field conditions, coloured shade nets resulted in higher maximum temperatures and relative humidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black net cover and open field gave the lowest mango yield among covers.

Treatment
black net covere0
Outcome
mango yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all greenhouse net covere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The black net cover and open field treatments gave the lowest mango yield compared to all greenhouse net cover.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White nets increased fruit number and total yield per plant.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
cv. Keitte1
Treatment
whitee0
Outcome
number of fruits and total yield per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the other treatments, the use of white or yellow nets resulted in a considerable increase in the number of fruits and total yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production (Mangifera indica L. cv. Keitt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow nets increased fruit number and total yield per plant.

Taxon
Mangifera indica L.Mangifera indicae1
Material
cv. Keitte1
Treatment
yellow netse0
Outcome
number of fruits and total yield per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to the other treatments, the use of white or yellow nets resulted in a considerable increase in the number of fruits and total yield per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“mango production (Mangifera indica L. cv. Keitt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black greenhouse cover gave the lowest productivity.

Treatment
Black greenhouse net covere0
Outcome
lowest productivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Black greenhouse net cover gave the lowest productivity during the experimental duration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White net return reached 15777 Egyptian pound in 2019.

Treatment
white nete0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
15777 Egyptian pounde0
Qualifier
2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return for white net reached 15777 Egyptian pound (LE) and LE 15270 per m2 in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White net return reached LE 15270 per m2 in 2020.

Treatment
white nete0
Outcome
net returne0
Value
LE 15270 per m2e0
Qualifier
2020e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return for white net reached 15777 Egyptian pound (LE) and LE 15270 per m2 in 2019 and 2020 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White net revenue to cost ratio was highest in both seasons, 1.9 and 1.8.

Treatment
white nete0
Outcome
Revenue to cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.9 and 1.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Revenue to cost ratio was found higher in white net in both seasons which were 1.9 and 1.8 respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded white and yellow nets could give the optimum microclimate for mango.

Treatment
white and yellow netse0
Outcome
optimum microclimate for growing mangoe0
Comparator
other net coverse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum microclimate for growing mango in similar conditions could be obtained under white and yellow nets compared to the other net covers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–946 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

light · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.