Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology

Chenyu Jiang; Yijia Gao; Jiabing Jiao; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inflorescence cutting is a critical cultural practice that enhances yield and fruit quality in mango cultivation. This study evaluated four treatments with the “Tainongyihao” mango: no cutting (CK), 1/3, 1/2, and 2/3 cutting of the central inflorescence axis, classified as light (L), medium (M), and heavy (H) cutting, respectively. Inflorescences were categorized by length, and field experiments were conducted during the growth periods of autumn–winter and winter–spring fruit in under-regulated and conventional harvest systems. The measured indicators include yield efficiency per unit trunk circumference, average fruit weight, reduced sugar content, total soluble solids (TSS), total titratable acids (TA), vitamin C content (Vc), and the TSS/TA ratio. Results indicated that light cutting was optimal for yield efficiency of autumn–winter fruit, while medium and heavy cutting were most effective for winter–spring fruit. Comprehensive fruit quality improved most under heavy cutting across all inflorescences. Long inflorescences benefited from heavy or medium cutting, medium inflorescences benefited from heavy cutting, and short inflorescences benefited from medium cutting. Interactive effects were observed between inflorescence-cutting treatments and inflorescence length, with fruit quality consistently improving under inflorescence-cutting treatments. Heavy cutting is recommended for manual operations, and all the results of this paper provide a foundation for developing artificial intelligence (AI)-based inflorescence-cutting technologies that enable precise and efficient mango cultivation practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light cutting was optimal for autumn–winter fruit yield efficiency.

Treatment
light cuttinge0
Outcome
yield efficiency of autumn–winter fruite0
Direction
optimale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light cutting was optimal for yield efficiency of autumn–winter fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–853 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium cutting was most effective for winter–spring fruit yield efficiency.

Treatment
medium cuttinge1
Outcome
winter–spring fruite0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium and heavy cutting were most effective for winter–spring fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“Long inflorescences benefited from heavy or medium cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy cutting was most effective for winter–spring fruit yield efficiency.

Treatment
heavy cuttinge0
Outcome
winter–spring fruite0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium and heavy cutting were most effective for winter–spring fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy cutting improved comprehensive fruit quality most across inflorescences.

Treatment
heavy cuttinge0
Outcome
Comprehensive fruit qualitye0
Direction
improved moste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive fruit quality improved most under heavy cutting across all inflorescences.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long inflorescences benefited from heavy cutting.

Organ / stage
Long inflorescencese0
Treatment
heavy cuttinge1
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long inflorescences benefited from heavy or medium cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“medium and heavy cutting were most effective for winter–spring fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long inflorescences benefited from medium cutting.

Organ / stage
Long inflorescencese0
Treatment
medium cuttinge0
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long inflorescences benefited from heavy or medium cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium inflorescences benefited from heavy cutting.

Organ / stage
medium inflorescencese0
Treatment
heavy cuttinge0
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“medium inflorescences benefited from heavy cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short inflorescences benefited from medium cutting.

Organ / stage
short inflorescencese0
Treatment
medium cuttinge0
Outcome
benefitede0
Direction
benefitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“short inflorescences benefited from medium cutting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inflorescence cutting and inflorescence length interacted in their effects on fruit quality.

Organ / stage
inflorescence lengthe0
Treatment
inflorescence-cutting treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Direction
improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interactive effects were observed between inflorescence-cutting treatments and inflorescence length, with fruit quality consistently improving under inflorescence-cutting treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1370 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend heavy cutting for manual operations.

Outcome
Heavy cuttinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heavy cutting is recommended for manual operations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“Optimization of ‘Tainongyihao’ Mango Inflorescence-Cutting Technology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: grain · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pruning · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

light · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.