Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Target-Based Physiological Modulations and Chloroplast Proteome Reveals a Drought Resilient Rootstock in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Genotypes

Kaukab Razi; Dong-Won Bae; Sowbiya Muneer

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

As climate changes increase, drought stress is becoming a problem for all major horticultural crops; among them is okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Despite its superior resilience to heat stress and high nutritional content, it is still underutilized in contrast to other vegetable crops. Moreover, the drought-resistant and drought-sensitive genotypes of okra are also not well known and require further exploration to improve their productivity. To investigate this in more detail, we performed comparative physiological and large-scale chloroplast proteomics on drought-stressed genotypes of okra. We evaluated four major genotypes of okra, viz., NS7774, NS7772, Green Gold, and OH3312 for drought resilient rootstock. The physiological modulations demonstrated a significant change by 50–76% in biomass, net-photosynthetic machinery, water transport, and absorption both in early and late stages of drought stress compared to well-watered crops in all genotypes. Maximum oxidative damage due to drought stress was observed for the genotypes NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312 as depicted by H2O2 and O2− determination. Greater oxidative stress was correlated to lesser antioxidant activity and expression of antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase and ascorbate peroxidase under stress in okra genotypes. The overall photosynthetic pigments, such as total chlorophyll, and total carotenoid content, were also decreased, and stomatal guard cells were disrupted and appeared closed compared to the control for the above three mentioned genotypes, except NS7774. A subsequent tissue-specific proteome analysis of chloroplasts and thylakoids analyzed by BN-PAGE (blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) revealed either over or under expression of specific proteins, such as ATPase, PSI, PSII core dimer, PSII monomer and ATP synthase. The expression of multiprotein complex proteins, including PSII-core dimer and PSII-core monomer, was slightly higher for the genotype NS7774 when compared to three other genotypes for both 5 and 10 days of drought stress. Further identification of specific proteins obtained in second dimension BN-PAGE provided descriptive detail of seven proteins involved in drought resistance across all genotypes. The identified proteins are majorly involved in photosynthesis under drought stress, suggesting NS7774 as a drought tolerant genotype. Further, the proteomic results were confirmed using Immunoblot by selecting specific protein such as PsaA. Overall, from our physiological modulations and chloroplast proteomics in all genotypes, we summarized NS7774 as a resilient rootstock and the other three genotypes (NS7772, OH3312, and Green Gold) as sensitive ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed biomass, net-photosynthetic machinery and water transport by 50–76% in okra genotypes compared with well-watered crops.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
biomass, net-photosynthetic machinery, water transporte0
Direction
significant changee0
Value
50–76%e0
Comparator
well-watered cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological modulations demonstrated a significant change by 50–76% in biomass, net-photosynthetic machinery, water transport, and absorption both in early and late stages of drought stress compared to well-watered crops in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress changed water absorption by 50–76% in okra genotypes compared with well-watered crops.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
absorptione0
Direction
significant changee0
Value
50–76%e0
Comparator
well-watered cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological modulations demonstrated a significant change by 50–76% in biomass, net-photosynthetic machinery, water transport, and absorption both in early and late stages of drought stress compared to well-watered crops in all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum oxidative damage under drought stress was observed in the genotypes NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312.

Material
NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
oxidative damagee0
Direction
Maximume0
Qualifier
as depicted by H2O2 and O2− determinatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum oxidative damage due to drought stress was observed for the genotypes NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312 as depicted by H2O2 and O2− determination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater oxidative stress was correlated with lesser antioxidant activity and lower expression of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase in okra.

Gene
catalase and ascorbate peroxidasee0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
lessere0
Qualifier
Greater oxidative stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Greater oxidative stress was correlated to lesser antioxidant activity and expression of antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase and ascorbate peroxidase under stress in okra genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased total chlorophyll and total carotenoid content in NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312 compared with the control, except NS7774.

Material
NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312e2
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
total chlorophyll, and total carotenoid contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
except NS7774e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The overall photosynthetic pigments, such as total chlorophyll, and total carotenoid content, were also decreased, and stomatal guard cells were disrupted and appeared closed compared to the control for the above three mentioned genotypes, except NS7774”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum oxidative damage due to drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“for the genotypes NS7772, Green Gold and OH3312”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1072 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal guard cells were disrupted and appeared closed under drought in the three genotypes compared with the control.

Organ / stage
stomatal guard cellse0
Outcome
disrupted and appeared closede0
Qualifier
compared to the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The overall photosynthetic pigments, such as total chlorophyll, and total carotenoid content, were also decreased, and stomatal guard cells were disrupted and appeared closed compared to the control for the above three mentioned genotypes, except NS7774”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A tissue-specific proteome of chloroplasts and thylakoids showed over or under expression of ATPase, PSI, PSII core dimer, PSII monomer and ATP synthase proteins.

Organ / stage
chloroplasts and thylakoidse1
Gene
ATPase, PSI, PSII core dimer, PSII monomer and ATP synthasee0
Outcome
expression of specific proteinse0
Direction
over or under expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“A subsequent tissue-specific proteome analysis of chloroplasts and thylakoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1632 · show in text ↑
e0

“revealed either over or under expression of specific proteins, such as ATPase, PSI, PSII core dimer, PSII monomer and ATP synthase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSII-core dimer and PSII-core monomer expression was slightly higher in NS7774 than in three other genotypes under drought stress for 5 and 10 days.

Material
NS7774e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Gene
PSII-core dimer and PSII-core monomere0
Outcome
expression of multiprotein complex proteinse0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
three other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The expression of multiprotein complex proteins, including PSII-core dimer and PSII-core monomer, was slightly higher for the genotype NS7774 when compared to three other genotypes for both 5 and 10 days of drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1834–2055 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-dimension BN-PAGE identified seven proteins involved in drought resistance across all genotypes.

Outcome
seven proteins involved in drought resistancee0
Qualifier
across all genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further identification of specific proteins obtained in second dimension BN-PAGE provided descriptive detail of seven proteins involved in drought resistance across all genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2235 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS7774 is suggested as a drought-tolerant genotype because its identified proteins are mainly involved in photosynthesis under drought stress.

Material
NS7774e0
Outcome
drought tolerant genotypee0
Qualifier
majorly involved in photosynthesis under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“The identified proteins are majorly involved in photosynthesis under drought stress, suggesting NS7774 as a drought tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2237–2370 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteomic results were confirmed by immunoblot of PsaA.

Gene
PsaAe0
Outcome
proteomic results were confirmede0
Qualifier
using Immunoblote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“Further, the proteomic results were confirmed using Immunoblot by selecting specific protein such as PsaA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2372–2477 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS7774 is summarised as a resilient rootstock among the okra genotypes.

Material
NS7774e0
Outcome
resilient rootstocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“we summarized NS7774 as a resilient rootstock and the other three genotypes (NS7772, OH3312, and Green Gold) as sensitive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2694 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NS7772, OH3312 and Green Gold are summarised as sensitive okra genotypes.

Material
NS7772, OH3312, and Green Golde0
Outcome
sensitive onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–134 · show in text ↑
e0

“we summarized NS7774 as a resilient rootstock and the other three genotypes (NS7772, OH3312, and Green Gold) as sensitive ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2694 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.