Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Root plasticity and xylem modifications drive drought resilience in okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] at the seedling stage

Sukhjiwan Jeet Kaur; Nilesh Talekar; Priyanka Upadhyay; et al.

16
claims
43
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] plays a vital role in ensuring food and nutritional security in arid and semi-arid regions; however, its growth is severely limited by drought stress. While root plasticity and physio-biochemical responses are known to contribute to drought resilience, their specific roles in okra remain underexplored. This study assessed drought tolerance in 55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions. Drought stress delayed germination and significantly reduced key growth parameters, including leaf number, shoot length, fresh and dry biomass, and survival rate. Root traits such as secondary root number, root length, and fresh root weight also declined, although the root-to-shoot ratio increased under severe stress, indicating an adaptive shift in biomass allocation. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and proline in response to drought, reflecting enhanced stress tolerance mechanisms. Based on overall performance, genotypes G51 (Sonam), G6 (HAU-480), G10 (Bhindi Champion), and G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as the most drought-tolerant, exhibiting superior root development and biomass accumulation. Oxidative stress markers, MDA and H 2 O 2 , also increased significantly under severe drought, further validating physiological damage and supporting the classification of tolerant and susceptible genotypes. Principal component analysis identified the mean productivity index and tolerance index as key contributors to genotypic variation under stress. Additionally, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) revealed genotype-specific xylem adaptations, with reduced vessel size in drought-tolerant genotypes likely mitigating the risk of embolism. These findings highlight the importance of root plasticity, xylem architecture, and biochemical adjustments in conferring drought tolerance in okra. Prioritizing traits such as secondary root formation and reduced xylem vessel size offers promising avenues for breeding resilient okra cultivars suited to water-limited environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress delayed germination of okra under PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
PEG 6000-induced osmotic stresse2
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
delayede1
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought stress delayed germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–548 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced leaf number, shoot length, and fresh and dry biomass of okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
PEG 6000-induced osmotic stresse2
Outcome
leaf number, shoot length, fresh and dry biomasse1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly reduced key growth parameters, including leaf number, shoot length, fresh and dry biomass, and survival rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–675 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress significantly reduced survival rate of okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
PEG 6000-induced osmotic stresse2
Outcome
survival ratee1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly reduced key growth parameters, including leaf number, shoot length, fresh and dry biomass, and survival rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–675 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress reduced secondary root number, root length, and fresh root weight of okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
PEG 6000-induced osmotic stresse2
Outcome
secondary root number, root length, and fresh root weighte3
Direction
declinede3
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e3

“Root traits such as secondary root number, root length, and fresh root weight also declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The root-to-shoot ratio of okra increased under severe stress.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
severe stresse4
Outcome
root-to-shoot ratioe4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e4

“although the root-to-shoot ratio increased under severe stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–832 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll, carotenoids, and proline were elevated in okra under drought.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
droughte5
Outcome
chlorophyll, carotenoids, and prolinee5
Direction
elevatede5
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e5

“Biochemical analyses revealed elevated levels of chlorophyll, carotenoids, and proline in response to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G51 (Sonam) emerged as among the most drought-tolerant okra genotypes, with superior root development and biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
G51 (Sonam)e6
Outcome
most drought-tolerante6
Qualifier
superior root development and biomass accumulatione6
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e6

“genotypes G51 (Sonam), G6 (HAU-480), G10 (Bhindi Champion), and G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as the most drought-tolerant, exhibiting superior root development and biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G6 (HAU-480) emerged as among the most drought-tolerant okra genotypes, with superior root development and biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
G6 (HAU-480)e6
Outcome
most drought-tolerante6
Qualifier
superior root development and biomass accumulatione6
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e6

“genotypes G51 (Sonam), G6 (HAU-480), G10 (Bhindi Champion), and G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as the most drought-tolerant, exhibiting superior root development and biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G10 (Bhindi Champion) emerged as among the most drought-tolerant okra genotypes, with superior root development and biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
G10 (Bhindi Champion)e6
Outcome
most drought-tolerante6
Qualifier
superior root development and biomass accumulatione6
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e6

“genotypes G51 (Sonam), G6 (HAU-480), G10 (Bhindi Champion), and G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as the most drought-tolerant, exhibiting superior root development and biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as among the most drought-tolerant okra genotypes, with superior root development and biomass accumulation.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
G45 (Pooja-01)e6
Outcome
most drought-tolerante6
Qualifier
superior root development and biomass accumulatione6
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e6

“genotypes G51 (Sonam), G6 (HAU-480), G10 (Bhindi Champion), and G45 (Pooja-01) emerged as the most drought-tolerant, exhibiting superior root development and biomass accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA and H2O2 increased significantly in okra under severe drought.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
55 okra genotypese2
Treatment
severe droughte7
Outcome
MDA and H 2 O 2e7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
0%e2
Setting
polyhouse conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e2

“55 okra genotypes subjected to three levels of PEG 6000-induced osmotic stress (0%, 10%, and 20%) under polyhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–512 · show in text ↑
e7

“Oxidative stress markers, MDA and H 2 O 2 , also increased significantly under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1349 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mean productivity index and tolerance index were the key contributors to genotypic variation of okra under stress.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Treatment
stresse3
Outcome
genotypic variatione3
Qualifier
mean productivity index and tolerance indexe3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“Principal component analysis identified the mean productivity index and tolerance index as key contributors to genotypic variation under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1607 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy revealed genotype-specific xylem adaptations in okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Organ / stage
xyleme3
Outcome
xylem adaptationse3
Qualifier
genotype-specifice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) revealed genotype-specific xylem adaptations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1719 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced vessel size occurred in drought-tolerant okra genotypes.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Material
drought-tolerant genotypese3
Outcome
vessel sizee3
Direction
reducede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduced vessel size in drought-tolerant genotypes likely mitigating the risk of embolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1814 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced vessel size is likely to mitigate the risk of embolism in okra.

Taxon
Abelmoschus esculentusAbelmoschus esculentuse0
Outcome
risk of embolisme3
Qualifier
reduced vessel sizee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“reduced vessel size in drought-tolerant genotypes likely mitigating the risk of embolism”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1726–1814 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Prioritizing secondary root formation and reduced xylem vessel size is suggested for breeding resilient okra cultivars for water-limited environments.

Outcome
secondary root formation and reduced xylem vessel sizee3
Setting
water-limited environmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Okra [ Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
e3

“Prioritizing traits such as secondary root formation and reduced xylem vessel size offers promising avenues for breeding resilient okra cultivars suited to water-limited environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2147 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 10 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.