Paper · 2014 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

INFLUENCE OF SULPHUR AND CARBOFURAN NEMATICIDE ON ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES IN SANDY SOIL

A.I. Abd EL-Fattah; E.F.A. Aly

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field trials were carried out in Nubaryia region, El BeheiraGovernorate, Egypt throughout two successive seasons of 2012/2013 and2013/2014 to examine the response of five multigerm varieties of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris, sacchrifera L.) as affected by agricultural sulphur(100 kg/fed.), and nematicide, furan (carbofuran10% G) at 13 kg/fed onroot knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita under naturally infected withit. A split-split plots design was used, where sulphur treatments in mainplots, the nematicide, in the sub-plots, and sugar beet varieties were sownin the sub-sub- plots. Results obtained cleared that number of galls/ plantsignificantly affected by sulphur treatments, this finding was true in bothgrowing seasons at the two studied age i.e. 3-momth or 6- month.Application of 100 kg sulphur reduced the values of galls from 15.6 to 9.0in the 1st age corresponding 38 to 25 in the 2nd age. The percent ofreduction amounted by 73.33% and 52.0% at age 3 and 6 monthsrespectively. Once more, the differences between sulphur treatments didnot reach the level of significant in respect to their effect on galls numberin the 2nd seasons of both ages. Concerning carbofuran (C) influence, theresults showed that the used nematicide compound significantly reducedthe percent values of gall’s number, the amount of reduction reached to140 and 152 % in the 1st and 2nd seasons at age of 3- month corresponding172 and 226.4 % in 6- month age in the 1st and 2nd season respectively.This result may be indicating to the high specificity against nematode.Regarding the different combination between the studied factors, it couldbe noted that the 1st and 2nd order interaction were significantly effected onthe values of gall’s number/ root in both seasons whether at 3-momth or 6-month ages. Once more by the end of growing season (six months), thevalues of egg masses significantly affected by the individual studiedfactors. Application of 100 kg sulphur significantly reduced the values ofeggmasses/root. As for, the influence of carbofuran nematicide on eggmasses, the available data appeared highly response to carbofuran inrespect to its effect on egg masses in the two growing seasons, usingcarbofuran et a reduction in this trait amounted by 113.33 and 137.5% inthe 1st and 2nd seasons respectively. Belong to varietal difference in respectto egg masses, the collected results showed sugar beet variety Gloriserecorded the lowest value of this trait in both seasons. This finding may beassured the gen make up role in its influence on varieties with respect to their resistance against nematode infection. The most effect interaction wasthat between sugar beet varieties and each of sulphar treatment andnematicide. Sugar beet root fresh weight, root diameter and sugar yield/fedincreased significantly at the studied rates of nematicide and sulphur in the1st and 2nd seasons. Root yield had the same trend in the 2nd season only.Sucrose% and sugar extractable% significantly increased at the rates ofnematicide and sulphur treatments in both seasons, respectively. Glorisevariety cleared the significant superiority over all the other tested ones insucrose%, without significant variance with lilly variety. The interactionbetween the used rates of sulphur and carbofuran nematicide had the sameeffect on root diameter in both seasons. Sulphur treatment at developedroot quality and reduced the impurity of juice of sugar beet and increasedroot growth as well as carbofuran nematicide did. Alpha amino nitrogen insugar beet roots was significantly influenced by sulphur and carbofurannematicide interaction in both seasons. Potassium, sucrose and extractablesugar percentages and percentage extractability of root juice weresignificantly recorded impacts by the interaction between varieties andsulphur levels in both seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur reduced root galls at three months.

Treatment
100 kg sulphure0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogene0
Outcome
gallse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
9.0in the 1st agee0
Comparator
15.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg sulphur reduced the values of galls from 15.6 to 9.0in the 1st age corresponding 38 to 25 in the 2nd age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita under naturally infected withit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur reduced root galls at six months.

Treatment
100 kg sulphure0
Outcome
gallse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
25 in the 2nd agee0
Comparator
38e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg sulphur reduced the values of galls from 15.6 to 9.0in the 1st age corresponding 38 to 25 in the 2nd age”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur differences in gall number were not significant in the second season.

Treatment
sulphur treatmentse0
Outcome
galls numbere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the differences between sulphur treatments didnot reach the level of significant in respect to their effect on galls numberin the 2nd seasons of both ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced gall numbers.

Treatment
carbofurane1
Outcome
gall’s numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
140 and 152 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the used nematicide compound significantly reducedthe percent values of gall’s number, the amount of reduction reached to140 and 152 % in the 1st and 2nd seasons at age of 3- month corresponding172 and 226.4 % in 6- month age in the 1st and 2nd season respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1485 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning carbofuran (C) influence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1161–1196 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The studied factor interactions significantly affected gall number.

Outcome
gall’s number/ roote0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 1st and 2nd order interaction were significantly effected onthe values of gall’s number/ root in both seasons whether at 3-momth or 6-month ages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur reduced egg masses per root.

Treatment
100 kg sulphure0
Outcome
eggmasses/roote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg sulphur significantly reduced the values ofeggmasses/root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1928–2008 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced egg masses in both seasons.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Outcome
egg massese1
Direction
reductione0
Value
113.33 and 137.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“usingcarbofuran et a reduction in this trait amounted by 113.33 and 137.5% inthe 1st and 2nd seasons respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2194–2307 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“on egg masses in the two growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2152–2192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glorise had the lowest egg mass value.

Material
Glorisee0
Outcome
lowest valuee0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sugar beet variety Gloriserecorded the lowest value of this trait in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2393–2474 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide and sulphur increased root fresh weight, root diameter and sugar yield.

Treatment
nematicide and sulphure0
Outcome
root fresh weight, root diameter and sugar yield/fede0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sugar beet root fresh weight, root diameter and sugar yield/fedincreased significantly at the studied rates of nematicide and sulphur in the1st and 2nd seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2725–2885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide and sulphur increased root yield in the second season.

Treatment
nematicide and sulphure1
Outcome
Root yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root yield had the same trend in the 2nd season only.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2886–2939 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sugar beet root fresh weight, root diameter and sugar yield/fedincreased significantly at the studied rates of nematicide and sulphur in the1st and 2nd seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2725–2885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide and sulphur increased sucrose and extractable sugar percentages.

Treatment
nematicide and sulphur treatmentse0
Outcome
Sucrose% and sugar extractable%e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose% and sugar extractable% significantly increased at the rates ofnematicide and sulphur treatments in both seasons, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2939–3074 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glorise had superior sucrose percentage, without a significant difference from lilly.

Material
Glorisee0
Outcome
sucrose%e0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
lillye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glorisevariety cleared the significant superiority over all the other tested ones insucrose%, without significant variance with lilly variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3075–3217 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur improved root quality and growth and reduced juice impurity.

Treatment
Sulphur treatmente0
Outcome
impurity of juicee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulphur treatment at developedroot quality and reduced the impurity of juice of sugar beet and increasedroot growth as well as carbofuran nematicide did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3346–3499 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur and carbofuran interaction affected root alpha amino nitrogen.

Treatment
sulphur and carbofurannematicidee0
Outcome
Alpha amino nitrogene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alpha amino nitrogen insugar beet roots was significantly influenced by sulphur and carbofurannematicide interaction in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3500–3633 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety by sulphur interaction affected potassium, sucrose, extractable sugar and extractability.

Treatment
sulphur levelse0
Outcome
Potassium, sucrose and extractablesugar percentagese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium, sucrose and extractablesugar percentages and percentage extractability of root juice weresignificantly recorded impacts by the interaction between varieties andsulphur levels in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3634–3836 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–107 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

carbofuran · pest · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

insecticide · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.