Paper · 2008 · Plant Breeding

Performance of sugar beet hybrids with sugar beet root maggot‐resistant pollinators

L. G. Campbell; J. Miller; M. Rekoske; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Sugar beet root maggot (SBRM; Tetanops myopaeformis ) is a major insect pest of sugar beet throughout much of North America. Two insecticides with the same mode of action are used almost exclusively for SBRM control. Alternative control strategies would be required if insecticide‐resistant SBRM developed or the insecticides were no longer available due to regulatory actions. Germplasm lines with SBRM resistance are available, but information on the SBRM resistance of hybrid cultivars created by crossing these lines with a SBRM‐susceptible cms parental line is lacking. This study compared the performance of four hybrids with SBRM‐resistant pollinators to two susceptible hybrids, with and without insecticide, in four environments. In all environments, the hybrids with the SBRM‐resistant pollinators and no insecticide had root yields equal to the SBRM‐susceptible commercial hybrid with insecticide. In two environments, the root yields of the SBRM‐susceptible hybrids were low and the difference between the root yields with and without insecticide was relatively small, indicating the insecticide was ineffective. In contrast, the root yields of the SBRM‐resistant hybrids, with or without insecticide, in these trials were substantially higher than the susceptible hybrids and similar to corresponding root yields at the other sites. Based upon these trials, it appears that hybrids produced with the currently available resistance sources would have sufficient SBRM resistance to prevent catastrophic yield reductions due to SBRM feeding, could reduce uncertainty caused by fluctuations in insecticide effectiveness, would provide protection against the development of insecticide‐resistant SBRM strains, and also provide a useful level of SBRM protection, if the current insecticides were no longer available.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant-pollinator hybrids without insecticide had equal root yields to a treated susceptible commercial hybrid.

Material
hybrids with the SBRM‐resistant pollinatorse0
Treatment
no insecticidee0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
SBRM‐susceptible commercial hybrid with insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all environments, the hybrids with the SBRM‐resistant pollinators and no insecticide had root yields equal to the SBRM‐susceptible commercial hybrid with insecticide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of sugar beet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two environments, insecticide had a relatively small root yield difference in susceptible hybrids.

Material
SBRM‐susceptible hybridse0
Treatment
insecticidee0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
relatively smalle0
Comparator
without insecticidee0
Setting
two environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In two environments, the root yields of the SBRM‐susceptible hybrids were low and the difference between the root yields with and without insecticide was relatively small, indicating the insecticide was ineffective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of sugar beet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant hybrids had substantially higher root yields than susceptible hybrids in these trials.

Material
SBRM‐resistant hybridse0
Treatment
with or without insecticidee0
Outcome
root yieldse0
Direction
substantially highere0
Comparator
susceptible hybridse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, the root yields of the SBRM‐resistant hybrids, with or without insecticide, in these trials were substantially higher than the susceptible hybrids and similar to corresponding root yields at the other sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of sugar beet hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.