Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF PLANTING DATE AND SULPHUR FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET UNDER NEWLY RECLAIMED SOILS

Sahar Tawfic; Ranya Abdel Aziz; A. Eanar

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments was conducted at El-Serw Agricultural Research Station, Damietta Governorate, Egypt during 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 seasons. The objective of this investigation was aimed to study the effect of three sowing dates (mid September , first October and mid October) and soil application of sulphur fertilizer in the form of Calcium poly sulfide (CaSO4 30% sulphur) at the levels of (zero, 100 and 200 kg CaSO4/fed., mixed with soil) which were applied at age 45 and 75 day, for Soltan cultivar. A split plot design with four replicates was used. The main plots were assigned to sowing dates, whereas, soil application with CaSO4 were distributed in the sub plots. The results can be summarized as follows:- 1- Lating planting sugar beet until mid October due to significant increase in root dimension and root fresh weight/plant in addition, applied sulphur at rate (200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur) take the same trend of lating planting date for the same characters. 2-Significant increase was obtained in quality characters as (TSS, Sucrose and Purity %) in both seasons resulted from planting at mid October and addition 200 kg calcium poly sulphur. 3- The highest values of all characters under study resulted from addition 200 kg sulphur for lat planting date in both seasons. 4- Significant decrease in values of impurities (K, Na and a-amino N.) were found resulted from lat planting up mid October and fertilization with 200 kg sulphur in both season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

mid October increased root dimension.

Treatment
mid Octobere0
Outcome
root dimensione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lating planting sugar beet until mid October due to significant increase in root dimension and root fresh weight/plant in addition, applied sulphur at rate (200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur) take the same trend of lating planting date for the same characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

mid October increased root fresh weight/plant.

Treatment
mid Octobere0
Outcome
root fresh weight/plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lating planting sugar beet until mid October due to significant increase in root dimension and root fresh weight/plant in addition, applied sulphur at rate (200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur) take the same trend of lating planting date for the same characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur increased root dimension.

Treatment
200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphure0
Outcome
root dimensione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lating planting sugar beet until mid October due to significant increase in root dimension and root fresh weight/plant in addition, applied sulphur at rate (200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur) take the same trend of lating planting date for the same characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur increased root fresh weight/plant.

Treatment
200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphure0
Outcome
root fresh weight/plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lating planting sugar beet until mid October due to significant increase in root dimension and root fresh weight/plant in addition, applied sulphur at rate (200 kg CaSO4 30% sulphur) take the same trend of lating planting date for the same characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

mid October increased TSS, sucrose and purity.

Treatment
mid Octobere0
Outcome
TSS, Sucrose and Purity %e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase was obtained in quality characters as (TSS, Sucrose and Purity %) in both seasons resulted from planting at mid October and addition 200 kg calcium poly sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

200 kg calcium poly sulphur increased TSS, sucrose and purity.

Treatment
200 kg calcium poly sulphure0
Outcome
TSS, Sucrose and Purity %e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant increase was obtained in quality characters as (TSS, Sucrose and Purity %) in both seasons resulted from planting at mid October and addition 200 kg calcium poly sulphur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The late planting plus 200 kg sulphur produced highest values of studied characters.

Treatment
addition 200 kg sulphur for lat planting datee0
Outcome
all characters under studye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
both seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest values of all characters under study resulted from addition 200 kg sulphur for lat planting date in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting and 200 kg sulphur decreased K, Na and alpha amino N impurities.

Treatment
lat planting up mid October and fertilization with 200 kg sulphure0
Outcome
impurities (K, Na and a-amino N.)e0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
both seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant decrease in values of impurities (K, Na and a-amino N.) were found resulted from lat planting up mid October and fertilization with 200 kg sulphur in both season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“SUGAR BEET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

calcium sulfate · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

calcium atom · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.