Paper · 2016

Bioefficacy of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl against complex weed flora in wheat

Tiwari, Ankit; Brijesh Kumar Verma; Dev, Jai; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2012–13 at Faizabad to study the bio-efficacy of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl and some other new herbicide molecules against complex weed flora in wheat. Significant reduction density was recorded at different stages of crop growth due to effect of different treatments. As far as the narrow leaved (P. minor) and BLWs were concerned, both type of weeds were effectively controlled by application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS which was proved superior with respect to number of effective shoots/m2 (0.32) and grain yield (3.95 t/ha) of wheat over rest of the other herbicidal treatments. Lower value of weed index was calculated in clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha (1.45%) followed by other herbicidal treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments significantly reduced weed density at different crop growth stages in wheat.

Treatment
different treatmentse0
Interactor
weed florat0weed
Outcome
densitye0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant reduction density was recorded at different stages of crop growth due to effect of different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS effectively controlled narrow-leaved P. minor and broad-leaved weeds in wheat.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DASe2
Interactor
P. minore2weed
Second interactor
BLWse2weed
Outcome
effectively controllede2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“As far as the narrow leaved (P. minor) and BLWs were concerned, both type of weeds were effectively controlled by application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS gave superior number of effective shoots (0.32 per m2) in wheat over the other herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DASe2
Outcome
number of effective shoots/m2e3
Direction
superiore3
Value
0.32e3
Comparator
rest of the other herbicidal treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“As far as the narrow leaved (P. minor) and BLWs were concerned, both type of weeds were effectively controlled by application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–530 · show in text ↑
e3

“proved superior with respect to number of effective shoots/m2 (0.32) and grain yield (3.95 t/ha) of wheat over rest of the other herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS gave superior wheat grain yield (3.95 t/ha) over the other herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DASe2
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
superiore3
Value
3.95 t/hae3
Comparator
rest of the other herbicidal treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e2

“As far as the narrow leaved (P. minor) and BLWs were concerned, both type of weeds were effectively controlled by application of clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha at 32 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–530 · show in text ↑
e3

“proved superior with respect to number of effective shoots/m2 (0.32) and grain yield (3.95 t/ha) of wheat over rest of the other herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha gave the lowest weed index (1.45%) in wheat, followed by the other herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/hae4
Outcome
weed indexe4
Direction
Lowere4
Value
1.45%e4
Comparator
other herbicidal treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“against complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–92 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lower value of weed index was calculated in clodinafop-propargyl + metsulfuron-methyl 400 g/ha (1.45%) followed by other herbicidal treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–835 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.