Paper · 2011 · Agrochemicals

The Control Effect and Security of 4 Herbicides against Gramineal Weeds in Wheat Field

Chen Chun-li

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Methods]The distribution of gramineal weeds populations in wheat field of shandong province were invested by using Visual Grade Rules.Eight representative locations were selected for field trial.And the safety on 17 wheat varieties was determined.[Results]The dominant varieties of gramineal weeds were Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Alopecurus aequalis sobol.,Paspalum sphondylodes Trin.ex Bge.,Aegilops squarrosa l.,Avena fatua l.,Beckmannia syzigachne(steud.)Fern.etc.,and all kinds of weeds showed a regional distribution.mesosulfuron-methyl provided good control effects,Flucarbazone-sodium showed the maximum control effect on Bromus japonicus Thunb.,but have not activity against Aegilops squarrosa l.,fenoxaprop-ethyl,clodinafop-propargyl provided good control effects in rice-wheat rotation field,but exhibited no activity against Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Aegilops squarrosa l.,lumai 14,Xunmai 29,Jimai 19,longmai 1 had the strongest drug resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dominant grass weeds varied by region in Shandong wheat fields.

Outcome
regional distributione0
Setting
shandong provincet1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant varieties of gramineal weeds were Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Alopecurus aequalis sobol.,Paspalum sphondylodes Trin.ex Bge.,Aegilops squarrosa l.,Avena fatua l.,Beckmannia syzigachne(steud.)Fern.etc.,and all kinds of weeds showed a regional distribution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“shandong province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesosulfuron-methyl provided good weed control.

Treatment
mesosulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
good control effectse0
Direction
goode0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mesosulfuron-methyl provided good control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flucarbazone-sodium gave maximum control of Bromus japonicus.

Treatment
Flucarbazone-sodiume0
Interactor
Bromus japonicus Thunb.Bromus japonicuse0weed
Outcome
control effect on Bromus japonicus Thunb.e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus japonicus
Bromus japonicus · InteractorJim Pisarowicz · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flucarbazone-sodium showed the maximum control effect on Bromus japonicus Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–650 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flucarbazone-sodium had no activity against Aegilops squarrosa.

Treatment
Flucarbazone-sodiumt1
Interactor
Aegilops squarrosa l.Aegilops tauschiie0weed
Outcome
activity against Aegilops squarrosa l.e0
Direction
not activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aegilops tauschii
Aegilops tauschii · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOleg Kosterin · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but have not activity against Aegilops squarrosa l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–702 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“Flucarbazone-sodium showed the maximum control effect on Bromus japonicus Thunb.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-ethyl controlled grass weeds in rice-wheat rotation fields.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-ethyle0
Outcome
good control effectse0
Direction
goode0
Setting
rice-wheat rotation fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenoxaprop-ethyl,clodinafop-propargyl provided good control effects in rice-wheat rotation field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl controlled grass weeds in rice-wheat rotation fields.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargyle0
Outcome
good control effectse0
Direction
goode0
Setting
rice-wheat rotation fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fenoxaprop-ethyl,clodinafop-propargyl provided good control effects in rice-wheat rotation field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-ethyl had no activity against Bromus japonicus and Aegilops squarrosa.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-ethylt1
Interactor
Bromus japonicus Thunb.Bromus japonicuse0weed
Second interactor
Aegilops squarrosa l.Aegilops tauschiie0weed
Outcome
no activity against Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Aegilops squarrosa l.e0
Direction
no activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus japonicus
Bromus japonicus · InteractorJim Pisarowicz · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aegilops tauschii
Aegilops tauschii · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOleg Kosterin · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but exhibited no activity against Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Aegilops squarrosa l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“fenoxaprop-ethyl,clodinafop-propargyl provided good control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl had no activity against Bromus japonicus and Aegilops squarrosa.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargylt1
Interactor
Bromus japonicus Thunb.Bromus japonicuse0weed
Second interactor
Aegilops squarrosa l.Aegilops tauschiie0weed
Outcome
no activity against Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Aegilops squarrosa l.e0
Direction
no activitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bromus japonicus
Bromus japonicus · InteractorJim Pisarowicz · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aegilops tauschii
Aegilops tauschii · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOleg Kosterin · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but exhibited no activity against Bromus japonicus Thunb.,Aegilops squarrosa l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–879 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“fenoxaprop-ethyl,clodinafop-propargyl provided good control effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–770 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four wheat varieties showed the strongest herbicide resistance.

Material
lumai 14,Xunmai 29,Jimai 19,longmai 1e0
Outcome
drug resistancee0
Direction
strongeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lumai 14,Xunmai 29,Jimai 19,longmai 1 had the strongest drug resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · Bromus japonicus · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.