Paper · 2021 · PeerJ

Impact of organic manure on fruit set, fruit retention, yield, and nutritional status in pomegranate (Punica granatumL. “Wonderful”) under water and mineral fertilization deficits

Mahmoud Abdel-Sattar; Khalid F. Almutairi; Abdulwahed M. Aboukarima; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This research was conducted on mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees growing at a site located in North Coast, Matrouh Governorate, Egypt. The aim was to investigate the impacts of different irrigation regimes in combination with different fertilizer regimes on the fruit set, fruit retention, yield, and nutritional status of the trees. The experimental factors were arranged in a split-plot design, with four replicates per treatment combination. The results indicated that all of the characteristics measured, including leaves nutritional status, percentages of fruit set, fruit drop, fruit retention, fruit cracking, fruit sunburn, and marketable fruit, and yield were significantly affected by the interaction between the irrigation treatment which denoted by percentages of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and fertilizer regime. The application of 75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manure under deficit irrigation of 80% ETo increased the yield by an average of 18.23% over the 2 years compared with 100% mineral fertilization under full irrigation, while 50% mineral fertilizer + 50% organic matter under 80% ETo gave the maximum percentage of marketable fruit (86.23% and 86.84% in 2018 and 2019, respectively). The maximum water use efficiency was obtained with the 80% ETo treatment combined with 75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manure in both seasons with values of 9.69 and 10.06 kg/m 3 applied water, respectively. These results demonstrate that under the field conditions at the experimental site, the fruit set and retention could be improved by applying a reduced amount of mineral fertilizer in combination with organic manure and less irrigation water.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by fertilizer interaction significantly affected leaf nutritional status, fruit set and fruit drop of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
leaves nutritional status, percentages of fruit set, fruit drope1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“including leaves nutritional status, percentages of fruit set, fruit drop, fruit retention, fruit cracking, fruit sunburn, and marketable fruit, and yield were significantly affected by the interaction between the irrigation treatment which denoted by percentages of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and fertilizer regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–857 · show in text ↑
e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by fertilizer interaction significantly affected fruit retention, fruit cracking and fruit sunburn of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
fruit retention, fruit cracking, fruit sunburne1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“including leaves nutritional status, percentages of fruit set, fruit drop, fruit retention, fruit cracking, fruit sunburn, and marketable fruit, and yield were significantly affected by the interaction between the irrigation treatment which denoted by percentages of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and fertilizer regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–857 · show in text ↑
e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by fertilizer interaction significantly affected marketable fruit and yield of pomegranate.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
marketable fruit, and yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“including leaves nutritional status, percentages of fruit set, fruit drop, fruit retention, fruit cracking, fruit sunburn, and marketable fruit, and yield were significantly affected by the interaction between the irrigation treatment which denoted by percentages of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and fertilizer regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–857 · show in text ↑
e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 75% mineral fertilizer with 25% organic manure under 80% ETo increased pomegranate yield by an average of 18.23% over two years compared with 100% mineral fertilization under full irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manure under deficit irrigation of 80% EToe3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
18.23%e3
Qualifier
over the 2 yearse3
Comparator
100% mineral fertilization under full irrigatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of 75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manure under deficit irrigation of 80% ETo increased the yield by an average of 18.23% over the 2 years compared with 100% mineral fertilization under full irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% mineral fertilizer with 50% organic matter under 80% ETo gave the maximum percentage of marketable pomegranate fruit, 86.23% and 86.84% in 2018 and 2019.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
50% mineral fertilizer + 50% organic matter under 80% EToe4
Outcome
percentage of marketable fruite4
Direction
maximume4
Value
86.23% and 86.84%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“50% mineral fertilizer + 50% organic matter under 80% ETo gave the maximum percentage of marketable fruit (86.23% and 86.84% in 2018 and 2019, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 80% ETo treatment combined with 75% mineral fertilizer and 25% organic manure gave the maximum water use efficiency of pomegranate in both seasons, 9.69 and 10.06 kg/m3 applied water.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
80% ETo treatment combined with 75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manuree5
Outcome
water use efficiencye5
Direction
maximume5
Value
9.69 and 10.06 kg/m 3e5
Qualifier
in both seasonse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“The maximum water use efficiency was obtained with the 80% ETo treatment combined with 75% mineral fertilizer + 25% organic manure in both seasons with values of 9.69 and 10.06 kg/m 3 applied water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1444 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying a reduced amount of mineral fertilizer with organic manure and less irrigation water could improve pomegranate fruit set and retention.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume2
Treatment
applying a reduced amount of mineral fertilizer in combination with organic manure and less irrigation watere6
Outcome
fruit set and retentione6
Direction
improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“mature pomegranate ( Punica granatum L. “Wonderful”) trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 31–89 · show in text ↑
e6

“the fruit set and retention could be improved by applying a reduced amount of mineral fertilizer in combination with organic manure and less irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1701 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

organic · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.